Literature DB >> 18673397

Is nasal packing really required after septoplasty?

Y Bajaj1, A N Kanatas, S Carr, N Sethi, G Kelly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Septoplasty is one of the most common operations performed by otorhinolaryngologists. Nasal packing is not an innocuous procedure. The most common problem encountered by the patients after septoplasty is the pain and discomfort during removal of the nasal packs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of septoplasty without postoperative nasal packing.
METHODS: Septoplasty was performed by standard technique. No nasal packing was used in these cases.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included in the study. The majority of the patients (64.1%; 50/78) on a morning list were operated. Sixty-two patients were discharged home the same day, the remaining others were discharged the next day. Our postoperative haemorrhage rate was 7.7% (6/78) and only 3.8% (3/78) patients required nasal packing. Majority (84.6%) of the patients were satisfied with the operation at the postoperative follow up 3 months later.
CONCLUSIONS: Septoplasty can be safely performed without postoperative nasal packing. Only 3.8% patients required nasal packing in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18673397     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01799.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  A comparative study of septoplasty with or without nasal packing.

Authors:  Basavaraj N Walikar; S M Rashinkar; M V Watwe; Anees Fathima; Ashfak Kakkeri
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02-23

Review 2.  Comparison on effectiveness of trans-septal suturing versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Wang; Bao-Cheng Dong
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A comparison of the effects of packing or transseptal suture on polysomnographic parameters in septoplasty.

Authors:  Murat Turhan; Aslı Bostancı; Mehmet Akdag; Oktay Dinc
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives.

Authors:  Rıza Önder Günaydın; Erdinc Aygenc; Selma Karakullukcu; Fatih Fidan; Serdar Celikkanat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double-blind study.

Authors:  G Thiagamoorthy; A Khalil; L Cardozo; S Srikrishna; G Leslie; D Robinson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Comparison of septoplasty with and without nasal packing and review of literature.

Authors:  Rajashri S Mane; Balasaheb Patil; Anjana Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-08

7.  Septal stapler use during septum surgery.

Authors:  Güven Yildirim; Cemal Cingi; Ercan Kaya
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Merocel versus Nasopore for nasal packing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jianzhang Wang; Changping Cai; Shili Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Bernardo; Sandra Alves; Nuno Barros Lima; Diamantino Helena; Artur Condé
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.