Literature DB >> 18673040

Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar stenosis and disc herniation.

Sean S Armin1, Langston T Holly, Larry T Khoo.   

Abstract

For decades, lumbar disc herniation and lumbar stenosis have been treated surgically via traditional open techniques. With recent emphasis on minimally invasive approaches in spine surgery, a number of new techniques has been introduced that are aimed at treating these 2 common pathological conditions. Currently the most widely used and efficacious minimally invasive technique for treating these disorders is direct decompression with minimally invasive surgery. Due to the scarcity of large randomized studies, however, it is difficult to compare the effectiveness and possible superiority of this technique with traditional decompression. Further studies are needed to evaluate this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18673040     DOI: 10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Chao Han; Zhu-Qing Liu; Shan-Jin Wang; Li-Jun Li; Jun Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar synovial cysts with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Daniel R Denis; Daniel Hirt; Saumya Shah; Daniel C Lu; Langston T Holly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-10-24

3.  Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: The Learning Curve of a Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Gil Kimchi; Alon Orlev; Amir Hadanny; Nachshon Knoller; Ran Harel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-10

Review 4.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Minimally invasive surgical decompression for lumbar spinal metastases.

Authors:  Jon Kimball; Nicholas A Kusnezov; Patrick Pezeshkian; Daniel C Lu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-06-12

6.  Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Ilyas S Aleem; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is biportal technique/endoscopic spinal surgery satisfactory for lumbar spinal stenosis patients?: A prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Taewook Kang; Si Young Park; Chun Hyung Kang; Soon Hyuck Lee; Jong Hoon Park; Seung Woo Suh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Navigated minimally invasive unilateral laminotomy with crossover for intraoperative prediction of outcome in degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Salvatore Massimiliano Cardali; Fabio Cacciola; Giovanni Raffa; Alfredo Conti; Maria Caffo; Antonino Germanò
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

9.  Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Wenbin Hua; Bingjin Wang; Wencan Ke; Xinghuo Wu; Yukun Zhang; Shuai Li; Shuhua Yang; Cao Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Comparision of biportal endoscopic and microscopic decompression in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: A comparative study protocol.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Tao Guan; Feng Tian; Xueqi Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.