Literature DB >> 18671271

In vivo performance of simvastatin-loaded electrospun spiral-wound polycaprolactone scaffolds in reconstruction of cranial bone defects in the rat model.

Erhan Pişkin1, I Alper Işoğlu, Nimet Bölgen, Ibrahim Vargel, Sarah Griffiths, Tarik Cavuşoğlu, Petek Korkusuz, Elif Güzel, Sarah Cartmell.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of large bone defects is still a major problem. Tissue-engineering approaches have become a focus in regeneration of bone. In particular, critical-sized defects do not ossify spontaneously. The use of electrospinning is attracting increasing attention in the preparation of tissue-engineering scaffolds. Recently, acellular scaffolds carrying bioactive agents have been used as scaffolds in "in situ" tissue engineering for soft and hard tissue repair. Poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) with two different molecular weights were synthesized, and the blends of these two were electrospun into nonwoven membranes composed of nanofibers/micropores. To stimulate bone formation, an active drug, "simvastatin" was loaded either after the membranes were formed or during electrospinning. The matrices were then spiral-wound to produce scaffolds with 3D-structures having both macro- and microchannels. Eight-millimeter diameter critical size cranial defects were created in rats. Scaffolds with or without simvastatin were then implanted into these defects. Samples from the implant sites were removed after 1, 3, and 6 months postimplantation. Bone regeneration and tissue response were followed by X-ray microcomputed tomography and histological analysis. These in vivo results exhibited osseous tissue integration within the implant and mineralized bone restoration of the calvarium. Both microCT and histological data clearly demonstrated that the more successful results were observed with the "simvastatin-containing PCL scaffolds," in which simvastatin was incorporated into the PCL scaffolds during electrospinning. For these samples, bone mineralization was quite significant when compared with the other groups. Copyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18671271     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ericka M Bueno; Julie Glowacki
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  An alginate-based hybrid system for growth factor delivery in the functional repair of large bone defects.

Authors:  Yash M Kolambkar; Kenneth M Dupont; Joel D Boerckel; Nathaniel Huebsch; David J Mooney; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  MiRNA inhibition in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Kelsey R Beavers; Christopher E Nelson; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Electrospun 3D composite scaffolds for craniofacial critical size defects.

Authors:  V Yogeshwar Chakrapani; T S Sampath Kumar; Deepa K Raj; T V Kumary
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Rational design of nanofiber scaffolds for orthopedic tissue repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Bing Ma; Jingwei Xie; Jiang Jiang; Franklin D Shuler; David E Bartlett
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  Novel applications of statins for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Sarita R Shah; Caroline A Werlang; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 17.275

7.  Evaluation of the effects of topically applied simvastatin on titanium implant osseointegration.

Authors:  Serkan Dundar; Alihan Bozoglan
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-04-17

Review 8.  Small molecule delivery through nanofibrous scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Erica J Carbone; Tao Jiang; Clarke Nelson; Nicole Henry; Kevin W-H Lo
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Influence of simvastatin-loaded implants on osseointegration in an ovariectomized animal model.

Authors:  Wen Fang; Shifang Zhao; Fuming He; Li Liu; Guoli Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Influence of statins locally applied from orthopedic implants on osseous integration.

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; David A Back; Kathrin Kaeppler; Norbert P Haas; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Britt Wildemann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.