Literature DB >> 18669966

A prospective trial comparing the Holland nail with the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.

N J Little1, V Verma, C Fernando, D S Elliott, A Khaleel.   

Abstract

We compared the outcome of patients treated for an intertrochanteric fracture of the femoral neck with a locked, long intramedullary nail with those treated with a dynamic hip screw (DHS) in a prospective randomised study. Each patient who presented with an extra-capsular hip fracture was randomised to operative stabilisation with either a long intramedullary Holland nail or a DHS. We treated 92 patients with a Holland nail and 98 with a DHS. Pre-operative variables included the Mini Mental test score, patient mobility, fracture pattern and American Society of Anesthesiologists grading. Peri-operative variables were anaesthetic time, operating time, radiation time and blood loss. Post-operative variables were time to mobilising with a frame, wound infection, time to discharge, time to fracture union, and mortality. We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables. The mean anaesthetic and operation times were shorter in the DHS group than in the Holland nail group (29.7 vs 40.4 minutes, p < 0.001; and 40.3 vs 54 minutes, p < 0.001, respectively). There was an increased mean blood loss within the DHS group versus the Holland nail group (160 ml vs 78 ml, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean time to mobilisation with a frame was shorter in the Holland nail group (DHS 4.3 days, Holland nail 3.6 days, p = 0.012). More patients needed a post-operative blood transfusion in the DHS group (23 vs seven, p = 0.003) and the mean radiation time was shorter in this group (DHS 0.9 minutes vs Holland nail 1.56 minutes, p < 0.001). The screw of the DHS cut out in two patients, one of whom underwent revision to a Holland nail. There were no revisions in the Holland nail group. All fractures in both groups were united when followed up after one year. We conclude that the DHS can be implanted more quickly and with less exposure to radiation than the Holland nail. However, the resultant blood loss and need for transfusion is greater. The Holland nail allows patients to mobilise faster and to a greater extent. We have therefore adopted the Holland nail as our preferred method of treating intertrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18669966     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  20 in total

1.  Factors affecting transfusion requirement after hip fracture: can we reduce the need for blood?

Authors:  Sagar J Desai; Kristi S Wood; Jackie Marsh; Dianne Bryant; Hussein Abdo; Abdel-Rahman Lawendy; David W Sanders
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty - Do we have the answer? Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Timothy Little; Nicholas Little
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-29

Review 3.  Hip fracture.

Authors:  David Oliver; Richard Griffiths; James Roche; Opinder Sahota
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-05-28

4.  Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for fixation of AO 31 A1/2 intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a 12-year comparison of failure, complications, and mortality.

Authors:  Casey S Whale; D Andrew Hulet; Michael J Beebe; David L Rothberg; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Ami R Stuart; Erik N Kubiak
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

6.  Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures?

Authors:  George A Macheras; Stefanos D Koutsostathis; Spyridon Galanakos; Konstantinos Kateros; Stamatios A Papadakis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur.

Authors:  Ranjeetesh Kumar; R N Singh; B N Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06-16

8.  Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Morten T Kristensen; Nicolai B Foss; Charlotte Ekdahl; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  CORR Insights™: Intramedullary nails result in more reoperations than sliding hip screws in two-part intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Paul J Dougherty
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  [Biaxial reconstruction nail for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Osteosynthesis].

Authors:  S Weihrauch; G Gradl; M Beck; R Rotter; T Mittlmeier; P Gierer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.