PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) kinetic and response to chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The kinetic was calculated using the slope of an exponential-regressive curve connecting the semi-logarithmic values of CEA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to select the CEA slope thresholds to define patients with progressive or responsive disease with the highest sensitivity, specificity, and diagnosis accuracy odds ratio (DOR). The correlation between the CEA slopes and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by the Cox model and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included. Progression defined by CEA slope greater than +0.05 resulted in sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 85.1%, and DOR of 34. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curve was 0.885 (95% CI, 0.815 to 0.936; P = .0001). Response defined by CEA slope less than -0.2 resulted in sensitivity of 74.7%, specificity of 82.5%, and DOR of 16. The AUROC curve was 0.847 (95% CI, 0.770 to 0.906; P = .0001). The difference between AUROC curves calculated with six or four CEA values was not significant. PFS was correlated with CEA slopes (hazard ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.48 to 8.57). The median PFS was 10 months for patients with CEA slope values less than -0.2 months versus 6 months for patients with CEA slope values greater than -0.2 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the CEA kinetic is an accurate, simple, and noninvasive method to identify the disease progression in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) kinetic and response to chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The kinetic was calculated using the slope of an exponential-regressive curve connecting the semi-logarithmic values of CEA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to select the CEA slope thresholds to define patients with progressive or responsive disease with the highest sensitivity, specificity, and diagnosis accuracy odds ratio (DOR). The correlation between the CEA slopes and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated by the Cox model and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included. Progression defined by CEA slope greater than +0.05 resulted in sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 85.1%, and DOR of 34. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curve was 0.885 (95% CI, 0.815 to 0.936; P = .0001). Response defined by CEA slope less than -0.2 resulted in sensitivity of 74.7%, specificity of 82.5%, and DOR of 16. The AUROC curve was 0.847 (95% CI, 0.770 to 0.906; P = .0001). The difference between AUROC curves calculated with six or four CEA values was not significant. PFS was correlated with CEA slopes (hazard ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.48 to 8.57). The median PFS was 10 months for patients with CEA slope values less than -0.2 months versus 6 months for patients with CEA slope values greater than -0.2 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the CEA kinetic is an accurate, simple, and noninvasive method to identify the disease progression in patients with unresectable metastasis of colorectal cancer.
Authors: François Ghiringhelli; Julie Vincent; Boris Guiu; Bruno Chauffert; Sylvain Ladoire Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-11-06 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Ozge Alper; William G Stetler-Stevenson; Lyndsay N Harris; Wolfgang W Leitner; Metin Ozdemirli; Dan Hartmann; Mark Raffeld; Mones Abu-Asab; Stephen Byers; Zhengping Zhuang; Edward H Oldfield; Yanhe Tong; Elke Bergmann-Leitner; Wayne E Criss; Koichi Nagasaki; Samuel C Mok; Daniel W Cramer; F Seyda Karaveli; Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky; Paul Leo; Kurt Stromberg; Robert J Weil Journal: Cancer Sci Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 6.716
Authors: Robbert J de Haas; Dennis A Wicherts; Eduardo Flores; Michel Ducreux; Francis Lévi; Bernard Paule; Daniel Azoulay; Denis Castaing; Antoinette Lemoine; René Adam Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 5.344