Literature DB >> 18668200

Rheological behavior of mammalian cells.

D Stamenović1.   

Abstract

Rheological properties of living cells determine how cells interact with their mechanical microenvironment and influence their physiological functions. Numerous experimental studies have show that mechanical contractile stress borne by the cytoskeleton and weak power-law viscoelasticity are governing principles of cell rheology, and that the controlling physics is at the level of integrative cytoskeletal lattice properties. Based on these observations, two concepts have emerged as leading models of cytoskeletal mechanics. One is the tensegrity model, which explains the role of the contractile stress in cytoskeletal mechanics, and the other is the soft glass rheology model, which explains the weak power-law viscoelasticity of cells. While these two models are conceptually disparate, the phenomena that they describe are often closely associated in living cells for reasons that are largely unknown. In this review, we discuss current understanding of cell rheology by emphasizing the underlying biophysical mechanism and critically evaluating the existing rheological models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18668200     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-008-8292-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  13 in total

1.  Focal adhesion kinase stabilizes the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Ben Fabry; Anna H Klemm; Sandra Kienle; Tilman E Schäffer; Wolfgang H Goldmann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Designing polyHEMA substrates that mimic the viscoelastic response of soft tissue.

Authors:  Brian Holt; Anubhav Tripathi; Jeffrey R Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Nucleoskeleton mechanics at a glance.

Authors:  Kris Noel Dahl; Agnieszka Kalinowski
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Mapping intracellular mechanics on micropatterned substrates.

Authors:  Kalpana Mandal; Atef Asnacios; Bruno Goud; Jean-Baptiste Manneville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterization of tissue biomechanics and mechanical signaling in uterine leiomyoma.

Authors:  John M Norian; Carter M Owen; Juan Taboas; Casey Korecki; Rocky Tuan; Minnie Malik; William H Catherino; James H Segars
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 6.  Emergent complexity of the cytoskeleton: from single filaments to tissue.

Authors:  F Huber; J Schnauß; S Rönicke; P Rauch; K Müller; C Fütterer; J Käs
Journal:  Adv Phys       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 25.375

7.  Distinguishing between Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis with MR Elastography.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Armando Manduca; Taofic Mounajjed; Harmeet Malhi; Douglas A Simonetto; Ruisi Wang; Liu Yang; Shennen A Mao; Jaime M Glorioso; Faysal M Elgilani; Christopher J Ward; Peter C Harris; Scott L Nyberg; Vijay H Shah; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Stress transmission within the cell.

Authors:  Dimitrije Stamenović; Ning Wang
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.090

9.  Scaffold-free tissue engineering: organization of the tissue cytoskeleton and its effects on tissue shape.

Authors:  Caitlin A Czajka; Agnes Nagy Mehesz; Thomas C Trusk; Michael J Yost; Christopher J Drake
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems.

Authors:  Donald E Ingber; Ning Wang; Dimitrije Stamenovic
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.