Literature DB >> 18668106

Evolutionary origin and development of snake fangs.

Freek J Vonk1, Jeroen F Admiraal, Kate Jackson, Ram Reshef, Merijn A G de Bakker, Kim Vanderschoot, Iris van den Berge, Marit van Atten, Erik Burgerhout, Andrew Beck, Peter J Mirtschin, Elazar Kochva, Frans Witte, Bryan G Fry, Anthony E Woods, Michael K Richardson.   

Abstract

Many advanced snakes use fangs-specialized teeth associated with a venom gland-to introduce venom into prey or attacker. Various front- and rear-fanged groups are recognized, according to whether their fangs are positioned anterior (for example cobras and vipers) or posterior (for example grass snakes) in the upper jaw. A fundamental controversy in snake evolution is whether or not front and rear fangs share the same evolutionary and developmental origin. Resolving this controversy could identify a major evolutionary transition underlying the massive radiation of advanced snakes, and the associated developmental events. Here we examine this issue by visualizing the tooth-forming epithelium in the upper jaw of 96 snake embryos, covering eight species. We use the sonic hedgehog gene as a marker, and three-dimensionally reconstruct the development in 41 of the embryos. We show that front fangs develop from the posterior end of the upper jaw, and are strikingly similar in morphogenesis to rear fangs. This is consistent with their being homologous. In front-fanged snakes, the anterior part of the upper jaw lacks sonic hedgehog expression, and ontogenetic allometry displaces the fang from its posterior developmental origin to its adult front position-consistent with an ancestral posterior position of the front fang. In rear-fanged snakes, the fangs develop from an independent posterior dental lamina and retain their posterior position. In light of our findings, we put forward a new model for the evolution of snake fangs: a posterior subregion of the tooth-forming epithelium became developmentally uncoupled from the remaining dentition, which allowed the posterior teeth to evolve independently and in close association with the venom gland, becoming highly modified in different lineages. This developmental event could have facilitated the massive radiation of advanced snakes in the Cenozoic era, resulting in the spectacular diversity of snakes seen today.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18668106     DOI: 10.1038/nature07178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  41 in total

1.  Tooth development in a model reptile: functional and null generation teeth in the gecko Paroedura picta.

Authors:  Oldrich Zahradnicek; Ivan Horacek; Abigail S Tucker
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  How do morphological sharpness measures relate to puncture performance in viperid snake fangs?

Authors:  S B Crofts; Y Lai; Y Hu; P S L Anderson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Dynamic evolution of venom proteins in squamate reptiles.

Authors:  Nicholas R Casewell; Gavin A Huttley; Wolfgang Wüster
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Role of the inflammasome in defense against venoms.

Authors:  Noah W Palm; Ruslan Medzhitov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution of Conus peptide toxins: analysis of Conus californicus Reeve, 1844.

Authors:  Jason S Biggs; Maren Watkins; Nicolas Puillandre; John-Paul Ownby; Estuardo Lopez-Vera; Sean Christensen; Karla Juarez Moreno; Johanna Bernaldez; Alexei Licea-Navarro; Patrice Showers Corneli; Baldomero M Olivera
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Has snake fang evolution lost its bite? New insights from a structural mechanics viewpoint.

Authors:  Chris Broeckhoven; Anton du Plessis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Reiterative pattern of sonic hedgehog expression in the catshark dentition reveals a phylogenetic template for jawed vertebrates.

Authors:  Moya M Smith; Gareth J Fraser; Natalie Chaplin; Carl Hobbs; Anthony Graham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system.

Authors:  Freek J Vonk; Nicholas R Casewell; Christiaan V Henkel; Alysha M Heimberg; Hans J Jansen; Ryan J R McCleary; Harald M E Kerkkamp; Rutger A Vos; Isabel Guerreiro; Juan J Calvete; Wolfgang Wüster; Anthony E Woods; Jessica M Logan; Robert A Harrison; Todd A Castoe; A P Jason de Koning; David D Pollock; Mark Yandell; Diego Calderon; Camila Renjifo; Rachel B Currier; David Salgado; Davinia Pla; Libia Sanz; Asad S Hyder; José M C Ribeiro; Jan W Arntzen; Guido E E J M van den Thillart; Marten Boetzer; Walter Pirovano; Ron P Dirks; Herman P Spaink; Denis Duboule; Edwina McGlinn; R Manjunatha Kini; Michael K Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Why do we study animal toxins?

Authors:  Yun Zhang
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2015-07-18

10.  The mitochondrial phylogeny of an ancient lineage of ray-finned fishes (Polypteridae) with implications for the evolution of body elongation, pelvic fin loss, and craniofacial morphology in Osteichthyes.

Authors:  Dai Suzuki; Matthew C Brandley; Masayoshi Tokita
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.