Literature DB >> 18666157

Comparison of the reproducibility of quantitative cardiac left ventricular assessments in healthy volunteers using different MRI scanners: a multicenter simulation.

Stephen J Gandy1, Shelley A Waugh, R Stephen Nicholas, Helen J Simpson, Wendy Milne, J Graeme Houston.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To derive reproducibility assessments of ejection fraction (EF) and left ventricular mass (LVM) from short-axis cardiac MR images acquired at single and multiple time-points on different 1.5T scanner models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of 15 healthy volunteers were acquired twice using a Magnetom Avanto scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and once using a Signa Excite scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) over four months, and analyzed using ARGUS and MASS Analysis+ software, respectively. Two physicists independently segmented the myocardial borders in order to derive intra- and interobserver assessments of EF and LVM for single and multiple time-points on the same and different scanners.
RESULTS: For EF, the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) increased as different observers, multiple time-points, and different scanners were introduced. The CoR ranged from 2.8% (intraobserver measurements, single time-point, same scanner) to 10.0% (interobserver measurements, different time-points, different scanners). For LVM, intraobserver CoR parameters were consistently smaller than interobserver values. The CoR ranged from 7.8 g (intraobserver measurements, single time-point, same scanner) to 39.5 g (interobserver measurements, different time-points, different scanners).
CONCLUSION: Reproducible EF data can be obtained at single or multiple time-points using different scanners. However, LVM is notably susceptible to interobserver variation, and this should be carefully considered if similar evaluations are planned as part of multicenter or longitudinal investigations. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666157     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  15 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of cardiac left ventricular variables obtained by MRI at 3 T: a pre- and post-contrast comparison.

Authors:  S Matthew; S J Gandy; R S Nicholas; S A Waugh; E A Crowe; R A Lerski; M H Dunn; J G Houston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Assessment of the accuracy of common clinical thresholds for cardiac morphology and function by transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexis; Benedict Costello; Leah M Iles; Andris H Ellims; James L Hare; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-11-05

5.  Reliability of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT for the reproducible evaluation of resting left ventricular functional parameters in long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Valentina Berti; Sabrina Genovese; Alberto Pupi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  LV mass assessed by echocardiography and CMR, cardiovascular outcomes, and medical practice.

Authors:  Anderson C Armstrong; Samuel Gidding; Ola Gjesdal; Colin Wu; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08

7.  Myocardial triglyceride content in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison between hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Eiryu Sai; Kazunori Shimada; Takayuki Yokoyama; Makoto Hiki; Shuji Sato; Nozomi Hamasaki; Masaki Maruyama; Ryoko Morimoto; Tetsuro Miyazaki; Shinichiro Fujimoto; Yoshifumi Tamura; Shigeki Aoki; Hirotaka Watada; Ryuzo Kawamori; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Definition of left ventricular remodelling following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review of cardiac magnetic resonance studies in the past decade.

Authors:  Damien Legallois; Amir Hodzic; Joachim Alexandre; Charles Dolladille; Eric Saloux; Alain Manrique; Vincent Roule; Fabien Labombarda; Paul Milliez; Farzin Beygui
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  Cardiac Imaging in Heart Failure with Comorbidities.

Authors:  Chiew Wong; Sylvia Chen; Pupalan Iyngkaran
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2017

10.  Association between myocardial triglyceride content and cardiac function in healthy subjects and endurance athletes.

Authors:  Eiryu Sai; Kazunori Shimada; Takayuki Yokoyama; Shuji Sato; Tetsuro Miyazaki; Makoto Hiki; Yoshifumi Tamura; Shigeki Aoki; Hirotaka Watada; Ryuzo Kawamori; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.