PURPOSE: To investigate the relevance of increasing b-values in evaluating liver fibrosis through the agreement of two diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 cirrhotic patients and 29 healthy volunteers were studied on a 1.5T system. Two single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences were acquired using sets of increasing b-values: 0, 150, 250, and 400 seconds/mm(2) (first sequence: DW1a) and 0, 150, 250, 400, 600, and 800 seconds/mm(2) (second sequence: DW2a). Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated on ADC maps. Noise-scaled single-point ADCs were calculated for each sequence from b = 400 seconds/mm(2). RESULTS: ADCs resulted significantly lower in cirrhotic patients compared to controls using both DW1a (mean 1.14 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.54 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second; P < 0.0001) and DW2a (mean 0.91 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.04 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second; P = 0.0089). DW1 and DW2, respectively significantly differed in diagnostic performance at receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (P = 0.003), showing AUCs of 0.93 (sensitivity 89.7%, specificity 100%) and 0.73 (sensitivity 62.1%, specificity 79.3%), respectively. Noise-scaled single-point ADCs showed a progressive convergence to similar values in cirrhotic and healthy livers at b = 800 seconds/mm(2) (1.12 +/- 0.27 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.13 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second). CONCLUSION: A DW sequence is accurate in assessing liver fibrosis using intermediate (400 seconds/mm(2)) rather than high (800 seconds/mm(2)) maximum b-values, but after proper recalculation of ADCs the effects of perfusion rather than diffusion should be considered responsible for the higher accuracy at lower b-values. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relevance of increasing b-values in evaluating liver fibrosis through the agreement of two diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 cirrhotic patients and 29 healthy volunteers were studied on a 1.5T system. Two single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences were acquired using sets of increasing b-values: 0, 150, 250, and 400 seconds/mm(2) (first sequence: DW1a) and 0, 150, 250, 400, 600, and 800 seconds/mm(2) (second sequence: DW2a). Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated on ADC maps. Noise-scaled single-point ADCs were calculated for each sequence from b = 400 seconds/mm(2). RESULTS: ADCs resulted significantly lower in cirrhotic patients compared to controls using both DW1a (mean 1.14 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.54 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second; P < 0.0001) and DW2a (mean 0.91 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.04 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second; P = 0.0089). DW1 and DW2, respectively significantly differed in diagnostic performance at receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (P = 0.003), showing AUCs of 0.93 (sensitivity 89.7%, specificity 100%) and 0.73 (sensitivity 62.1%, specificity 79.3%), respectively. Noise-scaled single-point ADCs showed a progressive convergence to similar values in cirrhotic and healthy livers at b = 800 seconds/mm(2) (1.12 +/- 0.27 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.13 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second). CONCLUSION: A DW sequence is accurate in assessing liver fibrosis using intermediate (400 seconds/mm(2)) rather than high (800 seconds/mm(2)) maximum b-values, but after proper recalculation of ADCs the effects of perfusion rather than diffusion should be considered responsible for the higher accuracy at lower b-values. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Moti Freiman; Stephan D Voss; Robert V Mulkern; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Simon K Warfield Journal: Med Phys Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: João Pedro Filipe; Luís Curvo-Semedo; João Casalta-Lopes; Maria Cristina Marques; Filipe Caseiro-Alves Journal: MAGMA Date: 2012-10-06 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Yi Wang; Daniel R Ganger; Josh Levitsky; Laura A Sternick; Robert J McCarthy; Zongming E Chen; Charles W Fasanati; Bradley Bolster; Saurabh Shah; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Reed A Omary; Richard L Ehman; Frank H Miller Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jignesh Patel; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hadrien A Dyvorne; Nicola Galea; Thomas Nevers; M Isabel Fiel; David Carpenter; Edmund Wong; Matthew Orton; Andre de Oliveira; Thorsten Feiweier; Marie-Louise Vachon; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yue Zhang; Ning Jin; Jie Deng; Yang Guo; Sarah B White; Guang-Yu Yang; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 2.546