Literature DB >> 18666139

Relevance of b-values in evaluating liver fibrosis: a study in healthy and cirrhotic subjects using two single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences.

Rossano Girometti1, Alessandro Furlan, Gennaro Esposito, Massimo Bazzocchi, Giuseppe Como, Franca Soldano, Miriam Isola, Pierluigi Toniutto, Chiara Zuiani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relevance of increasing b-values in evaluating liver fibrosis through the agreement of two diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 29 cirrhotic patients and 29 healthy volunteers were studied on a 1.5T system. Two single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequences were acquired using sets of increasing b-values: 0, 150, 250, and 400 seconds/mm(2) (first sequence: DW1a) and 0, 150, 250, 400, 600, and 800 seconds/mm(2) (second sequence: DW2a). Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the hepatic parenchyma were calculated on ADC maps. Noise-scaled single-point ADCs were calculated for each sequence from b = 400 seconds/mm(2).
RESULTS: ADCs resulted significantly lower in cirrhotic patients compared to controls using both DW1a (mean 1.14 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.54 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second; P < 0.0001) and DW2a (mean 0.91 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.04 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second; P = 0.0089). DW1 and DW2, respectively significantly differed in diagnostic performance at receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (P = 0.003), showing AUCs of 0.93 (sensitivity 89.7%, specificity 100%) and 0.73 (sensitivity 62.1%, specificity 79.3%), respectively. Noise-scaled single-point ADCs showed a progressive convergence to similar values in cirrhotic and healthy livers at b = 800 seconds/mm(2) (1.12 +/- 0.27 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second vs. 1.13 +/- 0.17 x 10(-3)mm(2)/second).
CONCLUSION: A DW sequence is accurate in assessing liver fibrosis using intermediate (400 seconds/mm(2)) rather than high (800 seconds/mm(2)) maximum b-values, but after proper recalculation of ADCs the effects of perfusion rather than diffusion should be considered responsible for the higher accuracy at lower b-values. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666139     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  32 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of optimal b-value range for perfusion-insensitive apparent diffusion coefficient imaging.

Authors:  Moti Freiman; Stephan D Voss; Robert V Mulkern; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Antifibrotic therapies--emerging biomarkers as treatment end points.

Authors:  Jayant A Talwalkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: usefulness of ADC values in the differential diagnosis of focal lesions and effect of ROI methods on ADC measurements.

Authors:  João Pedro Filipe; Luís Curvo-Semedo; João Casalta-Lopes; Maria Cristina Marques; Filipe Caseiro-Alves
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Magnetization transfer MRI in pancreatic cancer xenograft models.

Authors:  Weiguo Li; Zhuoli Zhang; Jodi Nicolai; Guang-Yu Yang; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Daniel R Ganger; Josh Levitsky; Laura A Sternick; Robert J McCarthy; Zongming E Chen; Charles W Fasanati; Bradley Bolster; Saurabh Shah; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Reed A Omary; Richard L Ehman; Frank H Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Jignesh Patel; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver with multiple b values: effect of diffusion gradient polarity and breathing acquisition on image quality and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters--a pilot study.

Authors:  Hadrien A Dyvorne; Nicola Galea; Thomas Nevers; M Isabel Fiel; David Carpenter; Edmund Wong; Matthew Orton; Andre de Oliveira; Thorsten Feiweier; Marie-Louise Vachon; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diffusion kurtosis imaging in the assessment of liver function: Its potential as an effective predictor of liver function.

Authors:  Daisuke Yoshimaru; Yasuo Takatsu; Yuichi Suzuki; Toshiaki Miyati; Yuhki Hamada; Ayumu Funaki; Ayumi Tabata; Chifumi Maruyama; Masahiko Shimada; Maki Tobari; Takayoshi Nishino
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Intra-voxel incoherent motion MRI in rodent model of diethylnitrosamine-induced liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Ning Jin; Jie Deng; Yang Guo; Sarah B White; Guang-Yu Yang; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: techniques and applications.

Authors:  Sara Lewis; Hadrien Dyvorne; Yong Cui; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.