Literature DB >> 18666050

Treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease - current status and trends.

M C Korinth1.   

Abstract

Although less frequent than lumbar degenerative disc disease, cervical disc disease may be much more neurologically compromising due to anatomical particularities. Since its first description together with the typical signs and symptoms the operative therapy of cervical disc disease has undergone a changeful evolution over the years. The frequent shifts of paradigms in treatment are particularly noticeable compared to other neurosurgical diseases. Initially, the dorsal decompression of neural structures (laminectomy) with a more or less invasive posterior approach (posterior foraminotomy) was the primary aim of the operation. Because of anatomical limitations, a paradigm shift occurred in the middle of the last century, favouring an anterior approach and discectomy, without and with implantation of various spacers (arthrodesis). A large variety of different materials and designs for these implants as alternatives to autologous iliac crest bone were established, all with the aim of creating a solid fusion of the operated segment. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), regarded worldwide as the "gold standard" for the treatment of cervical disc disease, was later complemented by modified, minimally invasive or endoscopic techniques using anterior and posterior approaches. The fear of adjacent level disease in the vicinity of a fused cervical segment led to another paradigm shift in the last few years, away from fusing procedures, towards new motion preserving technologies (arthroplasty) and back to minimally invasive dorsal techniques for the treatment of cervical disc disease. This article reviews the evolution of the operative treatment of cervical disc disease in the last 80 years, outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and technique and focuses on the rationale of the paradigm shifts. Current established and alternative treatment concepts are illuminated and discussed together with the currently relevant literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666050     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1081201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir        ISSN: 0044-4251


  27 in total

Review 1.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Two-level ACDF with a zero-profile stand-alone spacer compared to conventional plating: a prospective randomized single-center study.

Authors:  M Scholz; B Onal; P Schleicher; A Pingel; C Hoffmann; F Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Scholz; K J Schnake; A Pingel; R Hoffmann; F Kandziora
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Shoulder pain and dysfunction secondary to neural injury.

Authors:  Kari E Brown; Laurie Stickler
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-09

5.  Comparison of surgical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: does the intra-operative use of a microscope improve surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine Elsamadicy; Elizabeth Reiser; Cole Ziegler; Kyle Freischlag; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

Review 6.  Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Dario Romano; Francesco Certo; Pietro Milone; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Single anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self- locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage: evaluation of pain and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Stylianos Kapetanakis; Tryfon Thomaidis; George Charitoudis; Pavlos Pavlidis; Panagiotis Theodosiadis; Grigorios Gkasdaris
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

8.  Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Benjamin Khechen; Brittany E Haws; Dil V Patel; Daniel D Bohl; Kelly H Yom; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06-30

9.  [Observation of stand-alone MC+polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) Cage in anterior cervical double-level fusion for more than 2 years follow-up].

Authors:  Bing Jiang; Yuefeng Tao; Haiyun Chen; Xiaodong Huang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-09-15

10.  Sentinel sign in standalone anterior cervical fusion: Outcomes and fusion rate.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Luai M Mustafa; Moawiah M Mustafa; Amala Benny; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.