Literature DB >> 18665875

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation with a synchronized external low energy shock post-pulmonary vein isolation predicts recurrent atrial fibrillation.

John V Wylie1, Vidal Essebag, Matthew R Reynolds, Mark E Josephson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) with burst pacing after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is associated with recurrent AF.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether an external 30 Joule (J) shock synchronized to the R wave, during the vulnerable period of atrial repolarization, is able to risk-stratify patients further for AF recurrence after PV isolation.
METHODS: One hundred and sixteen consecutive patients underwent PV isolation for AF. Atrial burst pacing was performed after PV isolation. In patients without AF induced by burst pacing, a biphasic external 30 J shock synchronized to the R wave was delivered as a further test for inducible AF. Patients were followed for a mean of 16 months, and recurrent AF was defined as more than 10 sec of AF on ambulatory monitoring.
RESULTS: AF was induced in 19 (16%) of patients with burst pacing. Eighty-one patients who were noninducible with burst pacing had a 30 J shock administered, which induced AF in 16 (20%). In follow-up, 21% of patients who were noninducible with burst pacing or low-energy shock vs 54% who were inducible with either test developed recurrent AF at one year (HR 3.18, P = 0.0004 on multivariate analysis). Among patients who were noninducible with burst pacing, 18% who were noninducible with a low-energy shock vs 60% who were inducible with shock developed recurrent AF at one year (HR = 4.63, P = 0.0006 on multivariate analysis).
CONCLUSION: Inducibility of AF by a 30 J shock delivered during atrial repolarization after PV isolation may predict AF recurrence. Evaluation of inducibility of AF with burst pacing and a biphasic external synchronized shock after PV isolation may help guide postprocedure management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665875      PMCID: PMC2693942          DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  26 in total

1.  Effectiveness of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vidal Essebag; John V Wylie; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Comparing different strategies for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  David J Callans
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Josep Brugada; Douglas L Packer; Riccardo Cappato; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Pierre Jais; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Bruce D Lindsay; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Andrea Natale; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Non-inducibility post-pulmonary vein isolation achieving exit block predicts freedom from atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vidal Essebag; Ferdinando Baldessin; Matthew R Reynolds; Seth McClennen; Jignesh Shah; Kevin F Kwaku; Peter Zimetbaum; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Electrophysiological end point for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated from multiple pulmonary venous foci.

Authors:  M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; S Garrigue; A Takahashi; T Lavergne; M Hocini; J T Peng; R Roudaut; J Clémenty
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between 2 current ablation strategies.

Authors:  Martin R Karch; Bernhard Zrenner; Isabel Deisenhofer; Jürgen Schreieck; Gjin Ndrepepa; Jun Dong; Katrin Lamprecht; Petra Barthel; Etienne Luciani; Albert Schömig; Claus Schmitt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  A tailored approach to catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Eric Good; Sundar Sankaran; Stephen S Reich; Petar Igic; Darryl Elmouchi; David Tschopp; Thomas Crawford; Sujoya Dey; Alan Wimmer; Kristina Lemola; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Characterization of the electroanatomical substrate in human atrial fibrillation: the relationship between changes in atrial volume, refractoriness, wavefront propagation velocities, and AF burden.

Authors:  Pipin Kojodjojo; Nicholas S Peters; D Wyn Davies; Prapa Kanagaratnam
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-03

9.  Bi-directional electrical pulmonary vein isolation as an endpoint for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Vidal Essebag; John V Wylie; Matthew R Reynolds; Ferdinando Baldessin; Seth McClennen; Alexei Shvilkin; Joseph Germano; Allison Richardson; Peter J Zimetbaum; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Spectral analysis identifies sites of high-frequency activity maintaining atrial fibrillation in humans.

Authors:  Prashanthan Sanders; Omer Berenfeld; Mélèze Hocini; Pierre Jaïs; Ravi Vaidyanathan; Li-Fern Hsu; Stéphane Garrigue; Yoshihide Takahashi; Martin Rotter; Fréderic Sacher; Christophe Scavée; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; José Jalife; Michel Haïssaguerre
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.