Literature DB >> 18665702

Self-handicapping, excuse making, and counterfactual thinking: consequences for self-esteem and future motivation.

Sean M McCrea1.   

Abstract

Researchers interested in counterfactual thinking have often found that upward counterfactual thoughts lead to increased motivation to improve in the future, although at the cost of increased negative affect. The present studies suggest that because upward counterfactual thoughts indicate reasons for a poor performance, they can also serve as excuses. In this case, upward counterfactual thoughts should result in more positive self-esteem and reduced future motivation. Five studies demonstrated these effects in the context of self-handicapping. First, upward counterfactual thinking was increased in the presence of a self-handicap. Second, upward counterfactual thoughts indicating the presence of a self-handicap protected self-esteem following failure. Finally, upward counterfactual thoughts that protect self-esteem reduced preparation for a subsequent performance as well as performance itself. These findings suggest that the consequences of upward counterfactuals for affect and motivation are moderated by the goals of the individual as well as the content of the thoughts. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665702     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  6 in total

1.  Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research.

Authors:  Anna Dreber; Thomas Pfeiffer; Johan Almenberg; Siri Isaksson; Brad Wilson; Yiling Chen; Brian A Nosek; Magnus Johannesson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Questioning the preparatory function of counterfactual thinking.

Authors:  Hugo Mercier; Jonathan J Rolison; Marta Stragà; Donatella Ferrante; Clare R Walsh; Vittorio Girotto
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

3.  Counterfactual Thinking Facilitates Behavioral Intentions.

Authors:  Rachel Smallman; Neal J Roese
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-07

4.  Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.

Authors:  Robbie C M van Aert; Marcel A L M van Assen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-08

5.  The Bidirectional Relation Between Counterfactual Thinking and Closeness, Controllability, and Exceptionality.

Authors:  Yibo Xie; Sarah R Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 6.  Cognitive neuroscience of human counterfactual reasoning.

Authors:  Nicole Van Hoeck; Patrick D Watson; Aron K Barbey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.