Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is emerging as an important new therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer, chronic viral infections, and other diseases characterized by pathological immune suppression. With the goal of developing more potent IDO inhibitors, a systematic study of 4-phenylimidazole (4-PI) derivatives was undertaken. Computational docking experiments guided design and synthesis efforts with analogues of 4-PI. In particular, three interactions of 4-PI analogues with IDO were studied: the active site entrance, the interior of the active site, and the heme iron binding. The three most potent inhibitors (1, 17, and 18) appear to exploit interactions with C129 and S167 in the interior of the active site. All three inhibitors are approximately 10-fold more potent than 4-PI. The study represents the first example of enzyme inhibitor development with the recently reported crystal structure of IDO and offers important lessons in the search for more potent inhibitors.
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (n class="Gene">IDO) is emerging as an important new therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer, chronic viral infections, and other diseases characterized by pathological immune suppression. With the goal of developing more potent IDO inhibitors, a systematic study of 4-phenylimidazole (4-PI) derivatives was undertaken. Computational docking experiments guided design and synthesis efforts with analogues of 4-PI. In particular, three interactions of 4-PI analogues with IDO were studied: the active site entrance, the interior of the active site, and the hemeiron binding. The three most potent inhibitors (1, 17, and 18) appear to exploit interactions with C129 and S167 in the interior of the active site. All three inhibitors are approximately 10-fold more potent than 4-PI. The study represents the first example of enzyme inhibitor development with the recently reported crystal structure of IDO and offers important lessons in the search for more potent inhibitors.
Authors: Erika Vacchelli; Fernando Aranda; Alexander Eggermont; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Eric Tartour; Eugene P Kennedy; Michael Platten; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: William P Malachowski; Maria Winters; James B DuHadaway; Ariel Lewis-Ballester; Shorouk Badir; Jenny Wai; Maisha Rahman; Eesha Sheikh; Judith M LaLonde; Syun-Ru Yeh; George C Prendergast; Alexander J Muller Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Joseph A Maddry; Subramaniam Ananthan; Robert C Goldman; Judith V Hobrath; Cecil D Kwong; Clinton Maddox; Lynn Rasmussen; Robert C Reynolds; John A Secrist; Melinda I Sosa; E Lucile White; Wei Zhang Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Michael G Brant; Jake Goodwin-Tindall; Kurt R Stover; Paul M Stafford; Fan Wu; Autumn R Meek; Paolo Schiavini; Stephanie Wohnig; Donald F Weaver Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 4.345