BACKGROUND:Patient-centered communication (PCC) is associated with more appropriate treatment of depression in primary care. Aside from patient presentation, little is known about other influences on PCC. We investigated whether PCC is influenced by personality dispositions of primary care providers, independent of patient presentation. METHODS:Forty-six primary care providers completed personality scales from the NEO-Personality Inventory, revised and provided care to 88 standardized patients presenting with either major depression or adjustment disorder with comorbid musculoskeletal symptoms, either making or not making a medication request. Coders scored each visit using the measure of PCC, assessing physicians' ability to explore the patient's illness experience (component 1), understand the patient's psychosocial context (component 2), and involve the patient in collaborative discussions of treatment (component 3). RESULTS: Adjusting for physician demographics, training, and patient presentation, physicians who were more open to feelings explored the patient's experience of illness more (P = 0.05). More dutiful, or rule-bound physicians engaged in greater exploration of the patient's psychosocial and life circumstances (P = 0.04), but involved the patient less in treatment discussions (P = 0.03). Physicians reporting more anxious vulnerability also involved the patient less (P = 0.03). Physician demographics, training, and patient presentation explained 4-7% of variance in the measure of patient-centered communication components, with personality explaining an additional 4-7% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of personality dispositions that promote or detract from PCC may help medical educators better identify trainees of varying aptitude, facilitate medical career counseling, and address individual training needs in a tailored fashion.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patient-centered communication (PCC) is associated with more appropriate treatment of depression in primary care. Aside from patient presentation, little is known about other influences on PCC. We investigated whether PCC is influenced by personality dispositions of primary care providers, independent of patient presentation. METHODS: Forty-six primary care providers completed personality scales from the NEO-Personality Inventory, revised and provided care to 88 standardized patients presenting with either major depression or adjustment disorder with comorbid musculoskeletal symptoms, either making or not making a medication request. Coders scored each visit using the measure of PCC, assessing physicians' ability to explore the patient's illness experience (component 1), understand the patient's psychosocial context (component 2), and involve the patient in collaborative discussions of treatment (component 3). RESULTS:Adjusting for physician demographics, training, and patient presentation, physicians who were more open to feelings explored the patient's experience of illness more (P = 0.05). More dutiful, or rule-bound physicians engaged in greater exploration of the patient's psychosocial and life circumstances (P = 0.04), but involved the patient less in treatment discussions (P = 0.03). Physicians reporting more anxious vulnerability also involved the patient less (P = 0.03). Physician demographics, training, and patient presentation explained 4-7% of variance in the measure of patient-centered communication components, with personality explaining an additional 4-7% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of personality dispositions that promote or detract from PCC may help medical educators better identify trainees of varying aptitude, facilitate medical career counseling, and address individual training needs in a tailored fashion.
Authors: Carol E Franz; Ron Epstein; Katherine N Miller; Arthur Brown; Jun Song; Mitchell Feldman; Peter Franks; Steven Kelly-Reif; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Malathi Srinivasan; Richard L Kravitz; Ronald Epstein Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Ronald M Epstein; Cleveland G Shields; Peter Franks; Sean C Meldrum; Mitchell Feldman; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Malathi Srinivasan; Peter Franks; Lisa S Meredith; Kevin Fiscella; Ronald M Epstein; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Med Care Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Ronald M Epstein; Cleveland G Shields; Sean C Meldrum; Kevin Fiscella; Jennifer Carroll; Patricia A Carney; Paul R Duberstein Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Benjamin P Chapman; Ronald M Epstein; Kelly R McCollumn; Richard L Kravitz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Erik Fernandez Y-Garcia; Paul Duberstein; Debora A Paterniti; Camille S Cipri; Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Anna R Gagliardi; Sheila Dunn; Angel Foster; Sherry L Grace; Courtney R Green; Nazilla Khanlou; Fiona A Miller; Donna E Stewart; Simone Vigod; Frances C Wright Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elisah Margretha Buining; Margit K Kooijman; Ilse C S Swinkels; Martijn F Pisters; Cindy Veenhof Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 2.655