Literature DB >> 18664515

Exposure to metalworking fluid aerosols and determinants of exposure.

L Lillienberg1, A Burdorf, L Mathiasson, L Thörneby.   

Abstract

Metalworking fluid (MWF) aerosols are associated with respiratory disorders including asthma and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The aims of this study were to describe exposure to inhalable MWF aerosols and volatile compounds in machine shops, to estimate the influence of important determinants of exposure and to compare different sampling techniques for MWF aerosols. Personal full-shift air samples of inhalable aerosol (PAS-6 sampler) and total aerosol (open-faced sampler) were collected on operators in five medium to big-sized machine shops in three companies. The filters were analysed gravimetrically and extracted by supercritical fluid extraction for MWF aerosol and triethanolamine content. In addition, personal measurements were taken for formaldehyde and volatile compounds on adsorbent samplers. Continuous dust measurements were performed with a real-time instrument (DataRAM) during 2 h periods, using 1-min average values. In total, 95 measurements of inhalable aerosol and extracted MWF aerosols on 51 operators were conducted. Within the companies, the average exposure to inhalable aerosol ranged from 0.19 to 0.25 mg m(-3) with geometric standard deviations from 1.56 to 1.79. On average, the extracted fraction of MWF aerosol was 67% of the inhalable aerosol concentration. The exposure levels of triethanolamine, formaldehyde and volatile compounds were generally low. About 45% of the between-worker variance could be explained by use of compressed air, lack of complete enclosure of machines or grinding as cutting task. In 21 workers with continuous aerosol measurements, short-term peak exposures during 6% of the work time contributed to approximately 25% of the average concentration of inhalable MWF aerosol. Inhalable MWF aerosol concentration measured with the PAS-6 sampler was a factor 2 higher than the concentrations derived from the open-faced sampler. These findings suggest that control measures, such as full enclosure of machines and the elimination of the use of compressed air as cleaning technique, are required to reduce the exposure to MWF aerosols to levels below the expected threshold for adverse respiratory health effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18664515     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/men043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  6 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of exposure to metalworking fluid aerosols: a literature review and analysis of reported measurements.

Authors:  Donguk Park; Patrica A Stewart; Joseph B Coble
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-04

2.  Metal working fluid exposure and diseases in Switzerland.

Authors:  Michael F Koller; Claudia Pletscher; Stefan M Scholz; Philippe Schneuwly
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-07-04

3.  Airway symptoms and biological markers in nasal lavage fluid in subjects exposed to metalworking fluids.

Authors:  Louise Fornander; Pål Graff; Karin Wåhlén; Kjell Ydreborg; Ulf Flodin; Per Leanderson; Mats Lindahl; Bijar Ghafouri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Peak Inhalation Exposure Metrics Used in Occupational Epidemiologic and Exposure Studies.

Authors:  M Abbas Virji; Laura Kurth
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 5.  Occupational scenarios and exposure assessment to formaldehyde: A systematic review.

Authors:  Vittoria Cammalleri; Roberta Noemi Pocino; Daniela Marotta; Carmela Protano; Federica Sinibaldi; Stefano Simonazzi; Marta Petyx; Sergio Iavicoli; Matteo Vitali
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 6.554

6.  Early Effect Markers and Exposure Determinants of Metalworking Fluids Among Metal Industry Workers: Protocol for a Field Study.

Authors:  Nancy B Hopf; Eve Bourgkard; Valérie Demange; Sébastien Hulo; Jean-Jacques Sauvain; Ronan Levilly; Fanny Jeandel; Alain Robert; Yves Guichard; Jacques André Pralong; Nathalie Chérot-Kornobis; Jean-Louis Edmé; Pascal Wild
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-08-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.