Literature DB >> 18663556

Validity of the sonographic longitudinal sagittal image for assessment of the cartilage thickness in the knee osteoarthritis.

Chong-Hyeon Yoon1, Hyun-Sook Kim, Ji Hyeon Ju, Won-Hee Jee, Sung-Hwan Park, Ho-Youn Kim.   

Abstract

We compared the validity of the sonographic longitudinal sagittal image with the suprapatellar transverse axial image for assessment of thickness of femoral cartilage in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Fifty-one patients with knee OA were enrolled in this study. Cartilage thicknesses of medial and lateral femoral condyles were measured with longitudinal sagittal and suprapatellar transverse axial image using sonography. Fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also used to get the reference value. The joint space width (JSW) and Kellgren and Lawrence (K-L) grade were measured in weight-bearing anteroposterior knee radiograph. The kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine inter- and intra-observer agreement of the ultrasound sonography (US) measurements. In medial femoral condyle, the opportunity to obtain cartilage thickness was increased significantly using the longitudinal US scan as compared with tansverse scan (48 cases vs. 36 cases, p < 0.05). There was a good correlation between longitudinal US scan and MRI in the maximum and minimum cartilage thicknesses of medial condyle (r = 0.568; r = 0.844, respectively, p < 0.01). However, there was no correlation between suprapatellar transverse US scan and MRI in medial condyle. In lateral condyle, both US scans showed good correlations with MRI. In Bland-Altman analysis, longitudinal US scan showed good agreement with MRI except in the minimal cartilage thickness of lateral condyle. There was high overall intra- and inter-observer agreement in US scan. US scan in the longitudinal plane is a more feasible method than suprapatellar transverse scan for measuring cartilage thickness of medial femoral condyle in knee OA patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18663556     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-008-0956-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  29 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound of the knee.

Authors:  L Friedman; K Finlay; E Jurriaans
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist.

Authors:  E Filippucci; A Iagnocco; G Meenagh; L Riente; A Delle Sedie; S Bombardieri; G Valesini; W Grassi
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.473

4.  The validity of in vitro ultrasonographic grading of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage--a comparison with histologic grading.

Authors:  C-Y Tsai; C-L Lee; C-Y Chai; C-H Chen; J-Y Su; H-T Huang; M-H Huang
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Sonographic imaging of normal and osteoarthritic cartilage.

Authors:  W Grassi; G Lamanna; A Farina; C Cervini
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography.

Authors:  R J Wakefield; W W Gibbon; P G Conaghan; P O'Connor; D McGonagle; C Pease; M J Green; D J Veale; J D Isaacs; P Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-12

Review 9.  Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Christian Glaser
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonographic evaluation of the patients with knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study.

Authors:  S Tarhan; Z Unlu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  28 in total

1.  Sonography: a sensitive and specific method for detecting trochlear cartilage pathologies.

Authors:  Leila Aghaghazvini; Mohammad Naghi Tahmasebi; Reza Gerami; Arash Sharafat Vaziri; Bahman Rasuli; Mohamad Tahami; Fardis Vosoughi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-06-10

2.  How precisely does ultrasonographic evaluation reflect the histological status of the articular cartilage of the knee joint?

Authors:  Kosuke Maeguchi; Hiromu Ito; Yugo Morita; Moritoshi Furu; Takayuki Fujii; Masayuki Azukizawa; Akinori Okahata; Kohei Nishitani; Shinichi Kuriyama; Shinichiro Nakamura; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-08

3.  Comparison of ultrasound speed in articular cartilage measured by different time-of-flight methods.

Authors:  Satoru Ohashi; Isao Ohnishi; Takuya Matsumoto; Juntaro Matsuyama; Masahiko Bessho; Kenji Tobita; Masako Kaneko; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Efficacy of pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat; Tarek Helmy Ahmed Aly; Aly Elsayed Mohamed Elsayed; Ammar Suliman Mohamed Fadil
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Ultrasonic probe is useful for in vivo quantitative assessment of medial femoral condyle articular cartilage.

Authors:  Takashi Shimizu; Shigeyuki Wakitani; Yoshinari Tanaka; Yasukazu Yonetani; Yoshiki Shiozaki; Katsuji Shimizu; Shuji Horibe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Arif Kaya; Murat Kara; Tülay Tiftik; Mehmet Engin Tezcan; Mehmet Akif Öztürk; Ayşen Akıncı; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Patients with Behçet's Disease.

Authors:  I Batmaz; M Kara; T Tiftik; M Yildiz; R Çevik; L Özçakar
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 0.171

8.  Sagittal-Plane Knee Moment During Gait and Knee Cartilage Thickness.

Authors:  Randy J Schmitz; David Harrison; Hsin-Min Wang; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of femoral cartilage thickness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  I Batmaz; M Kara; T Tiftik; E Çapkin; M Karkucak; Ö F Serdar; F Kartal; M A Sariyildiz; L Özçakar
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 0.171

10.  Ultrasonographic measurement of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with occupational lead exposure.

Authors:  Mustafa T Yıldızgören; Ali E Baki; Murat Kara; Timur Ekiz; Tülay Tiftik; Engin Tutkun; Hınç Yılmaz; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.