BACKGROUND: While the association between obesity and endometrial cancer (EC) is well established, the underlying mechanisms require further study. We assessed possible links between lipid profiles and EC risk, while also taking into account BMI, parity, and menopausal status at baseline. METHODS: Using the information available from the Swedish Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk (AMORIS) study we created a cohort of 225,432 women with baseline values for glucose, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC). Two subgroups of 31,792 and 26,317 had, in addition, baseline measurements of HDL, LDL, apolipoprotein A-I and apoB and BMI, respectively. We used Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to analyze quartiles and dichotomized values of these lipid components for a link to EC risk. RESULTS: During mean follow-up of 12 years (SD: 4.15), 1,144 persons developed endometrial cancer. A statistically significant association was found between TG and EC risk when using both quartiles and a clinical cut-off (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.10 (95%CI: 0.88-1.37), 1.34 (1.09-1.63), and 1.57 (1.28-1.92)) for the 2(nd), 3(rd), and 4(th) quartile, compared to the 1(st), with P-value for trend: <0.001). The association remained after exclusion of the first three years of follow-up. Also total cholesterol and TG/HDL ratio were positively associated with EC risk, but no link was found for the other lipid components studied. CONCLUSION: This detailed analysis of lipid components showed a consistent relation between TG levels and EC risk. Future research should continue to analyze the metabolic pathway and its relation to EC risk, as a pathway to further understand the relation of obesity and disease.
BACKGROUND: While the association between obesity and endometrial cancer (EC) is well established, the underlying mechanisms require further study. We assessed possible links between lipid profiles and EC risk, while also taking into account BMI, parity, and menopausal status at baseline. METHODS: Using the information available from the Swedish Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk (AMORIS) study we created a cohort of 225,432 women with baseline values for glucose, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC). Two subgroups of 31,792 and 26,317 had, in addition, baseline measurements of HDL, LDL, apolipoprotein A-I and apoB and BMI, respectively. We used Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to analyze quartiles and dichotomized values of these lipid components for a link to EC risk. RESULTS: During mean follow-up of 12 years (SD: 4.15), 1,144 persons developed endometrial cancer. A statistically significant association was found between TG and EC risk when using both quartiles and a clinical cut-off (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.10 (95%CI: 0.88-1.37), 1.34 (1.09-1.63), and 1.57 (1.28-1.92)) for the 2(nd), 3(rd), and 4(th) quartile, compared to the 1(st), with P-value for trend: <0.001). The association remained after exclusion of the first three years of follow-up. Also total cholesterol and TG/HDL ratio were positively associated with EC risk, but no link was found for the other lipid components studied. CONCLUSION: This detailed analysis of lipid components showed a consistent relation between TG levels and EC risk. Future research should continue to analyze the metabolic pathway and its relation to EC risk, as a pathway to further understand the relation of obesity and disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lipid profiles; Swedish AMORIS study; endometrial cancer; risk factor
Authors: Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Hans Garmo; Niklas Hammar; Ingmar Jungner; Göran Walldius; Mats Lambe; Lars Holmberg Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Christine M Friedenreich; Rita K Biel; David C W Lau; Ilona Csizmadi; Kerry S Courneya; Anthony M Magliocco; Yutaka Yasui; Linda S Cook Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Todd R Sponholtz; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Pik-Fang Kho; Frederic Amant; Daniela Annibali; Katie Ashton; John Attia; Paul L Auer; Matthias W Beckmann; Amanda Black; Louise Brinton; Daniel D Buchanan; Stephen J Chanock; Chu Chen; Maxine M Chen; Timothy H T Cheng; Linda S Cook; Marta Crous-Bous; Kamila Czene; Immaculata De Vivo; Joe Dennis; Thilo Dörk; Sean C Dowdy; Alison M Dunning; Matthias Dürst; Douglas F Easton; Arif B Ekici; Peter A Fasching; Brooke L Fridley; Christine M Friedenreich; Montserrat García-Closas; Mia M Gaudet; Graham G Giles; Ellen L Goode; Maggie Gorman; Christopher A Haiman; Per Hall; Susan E Hankinson; Alexander Hein; Peter Hillemanns; Shirley Hodgson; Erling A Hoivik; Elizabeth G Holliday; David J Hunter; Angela Jones; Peter Kraft; Camilla Krakstad; Diether Lambrechts; Loic Le Marchand; Xiaolin Liang; Annika Lindblom; Jolanta Lissowska; Jirong Long; Lingeng Lu; Anthony M Magliocco; Lynn Martin; Mark McEvoy; Roger L Milne; Miriam Mints; Rami Nassir; Geoffrey Otton; Claire Palles; Loreall Pooler; Tony Proietto; Timothy R Rebbeck; Stefan P Renner; Harvey A Risch; Matthias Rübner; Ingo Runnebaum; Carlotta Sacerdote; Gloria E Sarto; Fredrick Schumacher; Rodney J Scott; V Wendy Setiawan; Mitul Shah; Xin Sheng; Xiao-Ou Shu; Melissa C Southey; Emma Tham; Ian Tomlinson; Jone Trovik; Constance Turman; Jonathan P Tyrer; David Van Den Berg; Zhaoming Wang; Nicolas Wentzensen; Lucy Xia; Yong-Bing Xiang; Hannah P Yang; Herbert Yu; Wei Zheng; Penelope M Webb; Deborah J Thompson; Amanda B Spurdle; Dylan M Glubb; Tracy A O'Mara Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 7.396