Literature DB >> 18662096

Estimates for worldwide laboratory animal use in 2005.

Katy Taylor1, Nicky Gordon, Gill Langley, Wendy Higgins.   

Abstract

Animal experimentation continues to generate public and political concern worldwide. Relatively few countries collate and publish animal use statistics, yet this is a first and essential step toward public accountability and an informed debate, as well as being important for effective policy-making and regulation. The implementation of the Three Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement of animal experiments) should be expected to result in a decline in animal use, but without regular, accurate statistics, this cannot be monitored. Recent estimates of worldwide annual laboratory animal use are imprecise and unsubstantiated, ranging from 28-100 million. We collated data for 37 countries that publish national statistics, and standardised these against the definitions of 'animals', 'purposes' and 'experiments' used in European Union Directive 86/609/EEC. We developed and applied a statistical model, based on publication rates, for a further 142 countries. This yielded our most conservative estimate of global animal use: 58.3 million animals in 179 countries. However, this figure excludes several uses and forms of animals that are included in the statistics of some countries. With the data available, albeit for only a few countries, we also produced, by extrapolation, a more comprehensive global estimate that includes animals killed for the provision of tissues, animals used to maintain genetically-modified strains, and animals bred for laboratory use but killed as surplus to requirements. For a number of reasons that are explained, this more-comprehensive figure of 115.3 million animals is still likely to be an underestimate.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18662096     DOI: 10.1177/026119290803600310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Lab Anim        ISSN: 0261-1929            Impact factor:   1.303


  42 in total

1.  One size does fit all.

Authors:  Katy Taylor
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Toxicology for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Ethical advantages of using domestic bird species for magnetic orientation research.

Authors:  Rafael Freire
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-01

4.  Crossing kingdoms: Using decellularized plants as perfusable tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Joshua R Gershlak; Sarah Hernandez; Gianluca Fontana; Luke R Perreault; Katrina J Hansen; Sara A Larson; Bernard Y K Binder; David M Dolivo; Tianhong Yang; Tanja Dominko; Marsha W Rolle; Pamela J Weathers; Fabricio Medina-Bolivar; Carole L Cramer; William L Murphy; Glenn R Gaudette
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Importance of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Animal Studies: Challenges for Animal-to-Human Translation.

Authors:  Zahra Bahadoran; Parvin Mirmiran; Khosrow Kashfi; Asghar Ghasemi
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Association of epidermal growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor polymorphisms with the risk of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the population of North China.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Wei Zhang; Aiqiang Xu; Li Zhang; Tao Yan; Zhuo Li; Xiaopan Wu; Xilin Zhu; Juan Ma; Ke Li; Hui Li; Ying Liu
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-06-22

7.  Contractile function of smooth muscle retained after overnight storage.

Authors:  B J Loong; J H Tan; K H Lim; Y Mbaki; K N Ting
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.

Authors:  Randall J Ellis
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-08-03

9.  Ethical and scientific considerations regarding animal testing and research.

Authors:  Hope R Ferdowsian; Nancy Beck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why scientists perform animal experiments, scientific or personal aim?

Authors:  Burhan Mayir; Uğur Doğan; Tuna Bilecik; Erdem Can Yardımcı; Tuğrul Çakır; Arif Aslaner; Yeliz Akpınar Mayir; Mehmet Tahir Oruç
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.