Literature DB >> 18661572

The association of proximal femur geometry with hip fracture risk.

V Ercan Dinçel1, Meltem Sengelen, Vesile Sepici, Turgay Cavuşoğlu, Behçet Sepici.   

Abstract

We aimed to discuss the risk assessments of patients with hip fractures due to the fall-related moderate or minimal trauma and compare them with non-fractured control patients by bone mineral density (BMD) and proximal femur geometric measurements to assess whether geometric measurements of femoral dimensions were associated with femoral strength and hip fracture risk. Forty-two osteoporotic patients with proximal femur fracture and 40 osteoporotic non-fractured age and gender-matched controls were included in the study. Lunar DXA was used for BMD measurements and proximal femur geometric measurements were performed manually on direct X-rays as hip axial length (HAL), femoral length (FL), and femoral neck width (FW). The trochanteric and total BMD values of the fracture group were significantly lower than the control group. There was a significant increase in FW/FL ratio in the fracture group that would be of specific importance for guidance: if FL values did not increase as did FW, it would point out a risk for fracture. The trochanteric BMD values were correlated with all increased measurements in the control group. There are genetically determined adaptive differences among individuals concerning bone morphology and bone mineral distribution. These different adaptations result in different bone strengths and fracture formation risk. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18661572     DOI: 10.1002/ca.20680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  [Research progress in biomechanics of common internal fixation for femoral neck fracture].

Authors:  Fuyang Wang; Yuchen Liu; Liangliang Cheng; Dewei Zhao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Hip geometry and femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonny Karunia Fajar; Taufan Taufan; Muhammad Syarif; Azharuddin Azharuddin
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Elevated 1-Year Mortality Rate in Males Sustaining Low-Energy Proximal Femur Fractures and Subgroup Analysis Utilizing Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Authors:  Kyle A Schultz; Benjamin A Westcott; Kimberly R Barber; Todd A Sandrock
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-20

6.  Predicting the Anatomical Location of Neck of Femur Fractures in Osteoporotic Geriatric Indian Population.

Authors:  M R Thirunthaiyan; K Mukherjee; Tkr Prashanth; D R Kumar
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2022-03

7.  Cortical thickness in the intertrochanteric region may be relevant to hip fracture type.

Authors:  Huafeng Zhuang; Yizhong Li; Jinkuang Lin; Donglu Cai; Siqing Cai; Lisheng Yan; Xuedong Yao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Ex Vivo Evaluation of Hip Fracture Risk by Proximal Femur Geometry and Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Chinese Women.

Authors:  Xiao-Jiang Yang; Hong-Xun Sang; Bo Bai; Xiang-Yu Ma; Chao Xu; Wei Lei; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-10-18

9.  Evaluation of Tryptophan/Kynurenine Pathway Relevance With Immune System Biomarkers of Low Energy Trauma Hip Fractures in Osteoporotic Patients.

Authors:  Ercan Dinçel; Yeşim Özkan; Murat Şüküroğlu; Hakan Özsoy; Aylin Sepici Dinçel
Journal:  Arch Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.472

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.