Literature DB >> 18661261

The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study.

Stella Mook1, Marjanka K Schmidt, Giuseppe Viale, Giancarlo Pruneri, Inge Eekhout, Arno Floore, Annuska M Glas, Jan Bogaerts, Fatima Cardoso, Martine J Piccart-Gebhart, Emiel T Rutgers, Laura J Van't Veer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 70-gene prognosis-signature has shown to be a valid prognostic tool in node-negative breast cancer. Although axillary lymph node status is considered to be one of the most important prognostic factors, still 25-30% of node-positive breast cancer patients will remain free of distant metastases, even without adjuvant systemic therapy. We therefore investigated whether the 70-gene prognosis-signature can accurately identify patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes who have an excellent disease outcome.
METHODS: Frozen tumour samples from 241 patients with operable T1-3 breast cancer, and 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes, with a median follow-up of 7.8 years, were selected from 2 institutes. Using a customized microarray, tumour samples were analysed for the 70-gene tumour expression signature. In addition, we reanalysed part of a previously described cohort (n = 106) with extended follow-up.
RESULTS: The 10-year distant metastasis-free (DMFS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) probabilities were 91% (SE 4%) and 96% (SE 2%), respectively for the good prognosis-signature group (99 patients), and 76% (SE 4%) and 76% (SE 4%), respectively for the poor prognosis-signature group (142 patients). The 70-gene signature was significantly superior to the traditional prognostic factors in predicting BCSS with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR) of 7.17 (95% CI 1.81 to 28.43; P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The 70-gene prognosis-signature outperforms traditional prognostic factors in predicting disease outcome in patients with 1-3 positive nodes. Moreover, the signature can accurately identify patients with an excellent disease outcome in node-positive breast cancer, who may be safely spared adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18661261     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0130-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  83 in total

Review 1.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Propensity score analysis of the prognostic value of genomic assays for breast cancer in diverse populations using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Abiola Ibraheem; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Cost effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in post-menopausal women with early-stage estrogen or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Bin Xie; Muriel Brackstone; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  P Sinn; S Aulmann; R Wirtz; S Schott; F Marmé; Z Varga; A Lebeau; H Kreipe; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Genomic profiling in luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Daniel Hofmann; Rachel Würstlein; Cornelia Liedtke; Ulrike Nitz; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Steven Shak; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert B Livingston; I-Tien Yeh; Peter Ravdin; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; Kathleen I Pritchard; Lois Shepherd; Julie R Gralow; Carl Yoshizawa; D Craig Allred; C Kent Osborne; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Building a personalized medicine infrastructure at a major cancer center.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; Carol Farhangfar; John Mendelsohn; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Systems pharmacology and genome medicine: a future perspective.

Authors:  Aislyn D Wist; Seth I Berger; Ravi Iyengar
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Comparison of prognostic gene profiles using qRT-PCR in paraffin samples: a retrospective study in patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Enrique Espinosa; Iker Sánchez-Navarro; Angelo Gámez-Pozo; Alvaro Pinto Marin; David Hardisson; Rosario Madero; Andrés Redondo; Pilar Zamora; Belén San José Valiente; Marta Mendiola; Manuel González Barón; Juan Angel Fresno Vara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.