Literature DB >> 18658022

Transplantation of de novo scaffold-free cartilage implants into sheep knee chondral defects.

Axel Jubel1, Jonas Andermahr, Gereon Schiffer, Jürgen Fischer, Klaus E Rehm, Martin J Stoddart, Hans J Häuselmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New cell-based treatments for articular cartilage repair are needed. As the optimal scaffold for cartilage repair has yet to be developed, scaffold-free cartilage implants may remove the complications caused by suboptimal scaffolds. HYPOTHESIS: The implantation of a scaffold-free, autologous de novo cartilage implant into standardized full-thickness cartilage defects of femoral condyles in sheep leads to a qualitatively better regenerative tissue than does periosteal flap alone or no treatment. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Chondral defects 4 mm in diameter (1 per sheep) were created in the center of 1 medial femoral condyle of 48 sheep. Twelve defects were allowed to heal spontaneously, 16 defects were covered with periosteal flaps alone, and 20 defects were filled with autologous de novo cartilage graft and overlaid with a periosteal flap. Differences were assessed macroscopically using the International Cartilage Repair Society score and microscopically using the International Cartilage Repair Society histological score and Mankin score at 26 and 52 weeks.
RESULTS: The results of the International Cartilage Repair Society Cartilage repair assessment showed that the transplant group was better than was the untreated control at both time periods but not significantly different than was the periosteal flap group. Implanted groups demonstrated a marked improvement in grade of defect filling, cartilage stability, cell distribution, and matrix assessments in each method of assessment. In the transplant group, 2 defects were filled with hyaline cartilage, 5 with mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage, and 2 with fibrocartilage alone.
CONCLUSION: Chondral defects treated with de novo cartilage transplantation show qualitatively better microscopic and macroscopic regeneration than do those treated with periosteal flaps alone. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of the current study show that third-generation autologous chondrocyte transplantation is a promising development in the field of biologic cartilage regeneration. Future studies should compare this technique with the original Brittberg technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18658022     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508321474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  13 in total

1.  Surgical Preparation for Articular Cartilage Regeneration in the Osteoarthritic Knee Joint.

Authors:  Joerg Mika; Thomas O Clanton; Catherine G Ambrose; Raimund W Kinne
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Genetic engineering of juvenile human chondrocytes improves scaffold-free mosaic neocartilage grafts.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Seth S Jump; Kelly S Santangelo; Duncan S Russell; Alicia L Bertone
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Alteration of the fibrocartilaginous nature of scaffoldless constructs formed from leporine meniscus cells and chondrocytes through manipulation of culture and processing conditions.

Authors:  Daniel J Huey; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 4.  Regeneration of articular cartilage of the knee.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  [Defect models for the regeneration of articular cartilage in large animals].

Authors:  B Schneider-Wald; A K von Thaden; M L R Schwarz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Advances in regenerative orthopedics.

Authors:  Christopher H Evans
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Fabrication of hyaline-like cartilage constructs using mesenchymal stem cell sheets.

Authors:  Hallie Thorp; Kyungsook Kim; Makoto Kondo; David W Grainger; Teruo Okano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Instruments for reproducible setting of defects in cartilage and harvesting of osteochondral plugs for standardisation of preclinical tests for articular cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Markus L Schwarz; Barbara Schneider-Wald; Joachim Brade; Dieter Schleich; Andy Schütte; Gregor Reisig
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Scaffold-free tissue engineering for injured joint surface restoration.

Authors:  Kazunori Shimomura; Wataru Ando; Hiromichi Fujie; David A Hart; Hideki Yoshikawa; Norimasa Nakamura
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2018-01-05

10.  REAC regenerative treatment efficacy in experimental chondral lesions: a pilot study on ovine animal model.

Authors:  Eraldo Sanna Passino; Stefano Rocca; Sabrina Caggiu; Nicolò Columbano; Alessandro Castagna; Vania Fontani; Salvatore Rinaldi
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.