Literature DB >> 18656869

Continuous compartment pressure monitoring vs. clinical monitoring in tibial diaphyseal fractures.

O Q Al-Dadah1, C Darrah, A Cooper, S T Donell, A D Patel.   

Abstract

A cohort of 109 consecutive patients with a tibial fracture who underwent continuous compartment pressure monitoring of the anterior compartment of the leg were reviewed and compared to a historical control group of the immediate previous 109 patients who were clinically monitored. Of these patients 33 underwent fasciotomies for acute compartment syndrome in association with tibial diaphyseal fractures. Seventeen patients had continuous compartment pressure monitoring and 16 clinical assessments alone. The fasciotomy rate of patients who underwent continuous compartment pressure monitoring was 15.6%. Patients who were not monitored had a fasciotomy rate of 14.7%. The mean time delay from injury to fasciotomy was 22 h in the monitored group and 23 h in the non-monitored group. Continuous compartment pressure monitoring did not increase the rate of unnecessary fasciotomies. We could not demonstrate a significant difference in terms of clinical outcome and time delay from injury to fasciotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18656869     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  12 in total

Review 1.  Compartment syndrome of the lower leg and foot.

Authors:  Michael Frink; Frank Hildebrand; Christian Krettek; Jurgen Brand; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In brief: closed tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  P Maxwell Courtney; Joseph Bernstein; Jaimo Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Assessment of elevated compartment pressures by pressure-related ultrasound: a cadaveric model.

Authors:  R M Sellei; S J Hingmann; C Weber; S Jeromin; F Zimmermann; J Turner; F Hildebrand; H-C Pape
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Acute compartment syndrome of the foot in a soccer player: a case report.

Authors:  Michelle A Laframboise; Brad Muir
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2011-12

5.  Acute compartment syndrome in patients undergoing fasciotomy of the forearm and the leg.

Authors:  Dafang Zhang; Matthew Tarabochia; Stein J Janssen; David Ring; Neal Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Diagnostics and treatment decisions in acute compartment syndrome. Results of a survey in German hospitals].

Authors:  R M Sellei; H Andruszkow; C Weber; T O Damen; H-C Pape; F Hildebrand
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The diagnosis of acute compartment syndrome: a review.

Authors:  M M McQueen; A D Duckworth
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Continuous Intracompartmental Pressure Monitoring for Acute Compartment Syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew D Duckworth; Margaret M McQueen
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2013-07-10

9.  The pathophysiology, diagnosis and current management of acute compartment syndrome.

Authors:  James Donaldson; Behrooz Haddad; Wasim S Khan
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-06-27

10.  TIBIAL SHAFT FRACTURES.

Authors:  Kodi Edson Kojima; Ramon Venzon Ferreira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.