R M Sellei1,2, H Andruszkow3, C Weber3, T O Damen3, H-C Pape3, F Hildebrand3. 1. Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Deutschland. richard.sellei@sana.de. 2. Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie , Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland. richard.sellei@sana.de. 3. Klinik für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie , Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The presented survey was intended to evaluate whether a standardization of diagnostics and therapy for acute compartment syndrome has been achieved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: University hospitals, academic teaching hospitals, and county hospitals in Germany were included. RESULTS: A total of 38% (n=120) of all contacted hospitals participated in this study with questions mainly answered by consulting physicians (68%). In general the importance of the clinical examination was considered as being more important than other diagnostic measures. In cases where further diagnostics were necessary, the intramuscular pressure measurement was used most frequently. Of the participants 50% performed surgical fasciotomy based on the clinical examination in combination with the intramuscular pressure measurement; however, there were considerable differences between the participating hospitals with respect to the anatomical position of intramuscular measurements, the limiting value of the intramuscular pressure and the surgical technique for performing fasciotomy. CONCLUSION: According to the presented analysis the diagnosis and indications for surgical treatment in patients developing an acute compartment syndrome do not seem to be sufficiently clarified. The establishment of unified treatment guidelines could help to reduce the number of delayed diagnoses of compartment syndrome.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The presented survey was intended to evaluate whether a standardization of diagnostics and therapy for acute compartment syndrome has been achieved. MATERIALS AND METHODS: University hospitals, academic teaching hospitals, and county hospitals in Germany were included. RESULTS: A total of 38% (n=120) of all contacted hospitals participated in this study with questions mainly answered by consulting physicians (68%). In general the importance of the clinical examination was considered as being more important than other diagnostic measures. In cases where further diagnostics were necessary, the intramuscular pressure measurement was used most frequently. Of the participants 50% performed surgical fasciotomy based on the clinical examination in combination with the intramuscular pressure measurement; however, there were considerable differences between the participating hospitals with respect to the anatomical position of intramuscular measurements, the limiting value of the intramuscular pressure and the surgical technique for performing fasciotomy. CONCLUSION: According to the presented analysis the diagnosis and indications for surgical treatment in patients developing an acute compartment syndrome do not seem to be sufficiently clarified. The establishment of unified treatment guidelines could help to reduce the number of delayed diagnoses of compartment syndrome.
Authors: Michael S Shuler; William M Reisman; Tracy L Kinsey; Thomas E Whitesides; E Mark Hammerberg; Maria G Davila; Thomas J Moore Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Christopher J Wall; Joan Lynch; Ian A Harris; Martin D Richardson; Caroline Brand; Adrian J Lowe; Michael Sugrue Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Thomas von Ahnen; Martin von Ahnen; Sonja Militz; Dana Preußer; Ulrich Wirth; Hans Martin Schardey; Stefan Schopf Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.352