Literature DB >> 18656640

Real money: complications and hospital costs in trauma patients.

Mark R Hemmila1, Jill L Jakubus, Paul M Maggio, Wendy L Wahl, Justin B Dimick, Darrell A Campbell, Paul A Taheri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major postoperative complications are associated with a substantial increase in hospital costs. Trauma patients are known to have a higher rate of complications than the general surgery population. We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) methodology to evaluate hospital costs, duration of stay, and payment associated with complications in trauma patients.
METHODS: Using NSQIP principles, patient data were collected for 512 adult patients admitted to the trauma service for > 24 hours at a Level 1 trauma center (2004-2005). Patients were placed in 1 of 3 groups: no complications (none), >or=1 minor complication (minor, eg, urinary tract infection), or >or=1 major complication (major, eg, pneumonia). Total hospital charges, costs, payment, and duration of stay associated with each complication group were determined from a cost-accounting database. Multiple regression was used to determine the costs of each type of complication after adjusting for differences in age, sex, new injury severity score, Glasgow coma scale score, maximum head abbreviated injury scale, and first emergency department systolic blood pressure.
RESULTS: A total of 330 (64%) patients had no complications, 53 (10%) had >or= 1 minor complication, and 129 (25%) had >or= 1 major complication. Median hospital charges increased from $33,833 (none) to $81,936 (minor) and $150,885 (major). The mean contribution to margin per day was similar for the no complication and minor complication groups ($994 vs $1,115, P = .7). Despite higher costs, the patients in the major complication group generated a higher mean contribution to margin per day compared to the no complication group ($2,168, P < .001). The attributable increase in median total hospital costs when adjusted for confounding variables was $19,915 for the minor complication group (P < .001), and $40,555 for the major complication group (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Understanding the costs associated with traumatic injury provides a window for assessing the potential cost reductions associated with improved quality care. To optimize system benefits, payers and providers should develop integrated reimbursement methodologies that align incentives to provide quality care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18656640      PMCID: PMC2583342          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cost reduction and quality improvement: it takes two to tango.

Authors:  P Pronovost; D C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Quality, advocacy, healthcare policy, and the surgeon.

Authors:  Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  The two-event construct of postinjury multiple organ failure.

Authors:  Ernest E Moore; Frederick A Moore; Alden H Harken; Jeffrey L Johnson; David Ciesla; Ani Banerjee
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Building the business case for clinical quality.

Authors:  William J Ward; Lynn Spragens; Ken Smithson
Journal:  Healthc Financ Manage       Date:  2006-12

5.  Outcomes for trauma: is there an end (result) in sight?

Authors:  Michael D Pasquale
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-01

6.  Who pays for poor surgical quality? Building a business case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; William B Weeks; Raj J Karia; Smita Das; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  The complications of trauma and their associated costs in a level I trauma center.

Authors:  G E O'Keefe; R V Maier; P Diehr; D Grossman; G J Jurkovich; D Conrad
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-08

8.  Distribution of variable vs fixed costs of hospital care.

Authors:  R R Roberts; P W Frutos; G G Ciavarella; L M Gussow; E K Mensah; L M Kampe; H E Straus; G Joseph; R J Rydman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Detecting the blind spot: complications in the trauma registry and trauma quality improvement.

Authors:  Mark R Hemmila; Jill L Jakubus; Wendy L Wahl; Saman Arbabi; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Paul A Taheri; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Steven L Chen; Paul A Taheri; William G Henderson; Shukri F Khuri; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.113

  10 in total
  26 in total

1.  Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; David A Garcia; Sherry M Wren; Paul J Karanicolas; Juan I Arcelus; John A Heit; Charles M Samama
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Multiclassifier Systems for Predicting Neurological Outcome of Patients with Severe Trauma and Polytrauma in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Javier González-Robledo; Félix Martín-González; Mercedes Sánchez-Barba; Fernando Sánchez-Hernández; María N Moreno-García
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Conservative Management of High-grade Renal Trauma Does Not Lead to Prolonged Hospital Stay.

Authors:  Lindsay A Hampson; Kushan D Radadia; Anobel Y Odisho; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Association of Hospital Participation in a Regional Trauma Quality Improvement Collaborative With Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark R Hemmila; Anne H Cain-Nielsen; Jill L Jakubus; Judy N Mikhail; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  The risk of adverse events in orthopaedic trauma varies by anatomic region of surgery: an analysis of fifty thousand four hundred and twenty one patients.

Authors:  Nikita Lakomkin; Sarah E Greenberg; William T Obremskey; Manish K Sethi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Interleukin 10 overexpression alters survival in the setting of gram-negative pneumonia following lung contusion.

Authors:  Vladislav A Dolgachev; Bi Yu; Lei Sun; Thomas P Shanley; Krishnan Raghavendran; Mark R Hemmila
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 7.  Review of Internal Radiocarpal Distraction Plating for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Venus Vakhshori; Ram Kiran Alluri; Milan Stevanovic; Alidad Ghiassi
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-07-13

8.  Hospital readmissions: necessary evil or preventable target for quality improvement.

Authors:  Erin G Brown; Debra Burgess; Chin-Shang Li; Robert J Canter; Richard J Bold
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Dalteparin versus Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in trauma patients.

Authors:  O T Okoye; R Gelbard; K Inaba; M Esparza; H Belzberg; P Talving; P G Teixeira; L S Chan; D Demetriades
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 10.  The Burden of High-Energy Musculoskeletal Trauma in High-Income Countries.

Authors:  P Hoogervorst; D W Shearer; T Miclau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.