OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to describe socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in Europe and to get further insight into socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in different European populations by relating these to socioeconomic inequalities in overall mortality and smoking within the same or reference populations. Particular attention is paid to inequalities in Eastern European and Baltic countries. METHODS: Data were obtained from mortality registers, population censuses and health interview surveys in 16 European populations. Educational inequalities in lung cancer and total mortality were assessed by direct standardization and calculation of two indices of inequality: the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). SIIs were used to calculate the contribution of inequalities in lung cancer mortality to inequalities in total mortality. Indices of inequality in lung cancer mortality in the age group 40-59 years were compared with indices of inequalities in smoking taking into account a time lag of 20 years. RESULTS: The pattern of inequalities in Eastern European and Baltic countries is more or less similar as the one observed in the Northern countries. Among men educational inequalities are largest in the Eastern European and Baltic countries. Among women they are largest in Northern European countries. Whereas among Southern European women lung cancer mortality rates are still higher among the high educated, we observe a negative association between smoking and education among young female adults. The contribution of lung cancer mortality inequalities to total mortality inequalities is in most male populations more than 10%. Important smoking inequalities are observed among young adults in all populations. In Sweden, Hungary and the Czech Republic smoking inequalities among young adult women are larger than lung cancer mortality inequalities among women aged 20 years older. CONCLUSIONS: Important socioeconomic inequalities exist in lung cancer mortality in Europe. They are consistent with the geographical spread of the smoking epidemic. In the next decades socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality are likely to persist and even increase among women. In Southern European countries we may expect a reversal from a positive to a negative association between socioeconomic status and lung cancer mortality. Continuous efforts are necessary to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in all European countries.
OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to describe socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in Europe and to get further insight into socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in different European populations by relating these to socioeconomic inequalities in overall mortality and smoking within the same or reference populations. Particular attention is paid to inequalities in Eastern European and Baltic countries. METHODS: Data were obtained from mortality registers, population censuses and health interview surveys in 16 European populations. Educational inequalities in lung cancer and total mortality were assessed by direct standardization and calculation of two indices of inequality: the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). SIIs were used to calculate the contribution of inequalities in lung cancer mortality to inequalities in total mortality. Indices of inequality in lung cancer mortality in the age group 40-59 years were compared with indices of inequalities in smoking taking into account a time lag of 20 years. RESULTS: The pattern of inequalities in Eastern European and Baltic countries is more or less similar as the one observed in the Northern countries. Among men educational inequalities are largest in the Eastern European and Baltic countries. Among women they are largest in Northern European countries. Whereas among Southern European womenlung cancer mortality rates are still higher among the high educated, we observe a negative association between smoking and education among young female adults. The contribution of lung cancer mortality inequalities to total mortality inequalities is in most male populations more than 10%. Important smoking inequalities are observed among young adults in all populations. In Sweden, Hungary and the Czech Republic smoking inequalities among young adult women are larger than lung cancer mortality inequalities among women aged 20 years older. CONCLUSIONS: Important socioeconomic inequalities exist in lung cancer mortality in Europe. They are consistent with the geographical spread of the smoking epidemic. In the next decades socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality are likely to persist and even increase among women. In Southern European countries we may expect a reversal from a positive to a negative association between socioeconomic status and lung cancer mortality. Continuous efforts are necessary to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in all European countries.
Authors: H Naik; X Qiu; M C Brown; L Eng; D Pringle; M Mahler; H Hon; K Tiessen; H Thai; V Ho; C Gonos; R Charow; V Pat; M Irwin; L Herzog; A Ho; W Xu; J M Jones; D Howell; G Liu Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Mark Lawler; Thierry Le Chevalier; Martin J Murphy; Ian Banks; Pierfranco Conte; Francesco De Lorenzo; Françoise Meunier; H M Pinedo; Peter Selby; Jean-Pierre Armand; Mariano Barbacid; Michèle Barzach; Jonas Bergh; Gerlind Bode; David A Cameron; Filippo de Braud; Aimery de Gramont; Volker Diehl; Sarper Diler; Sema Erdem; John M Fitzpatrick; Jan Geissler; Donal Hollywood; Liselotte Højgaard; Denis Horgan; Jacek Jassem; Peter W Johnson; Peter Kapitein; Joan Kelly; Sandra Kloezen; Carlo La Vecchia; Bob Löwenberg; Kathy Oliver; Richard Sullivan; Josep Tabernero; Cornelis J Van de Velde; Nils Wilking; Roger Wilson; Christoph Zielinski; Harald Zur Hausen; Patrick G Johnston Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-02-03
Authors: Dan Lewer; Martin McKee; Antonio Gasparrini; Aaron Reeves; Cesar de Oliveira Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Kirsi M Talala; Taina M Huurre; Tiina K M Laatikainen; Tuija P Martelin; Aini I Ostamo; Ritva S Prättälä Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Domantas Jasilionis; Giedre Smailyte; Ieva Vincerzevskiene; Vladimir M Shkolnikov Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: David I Conway; Darren R Brenner; Alex D McMahon; Lorna M D Macpherson; Antonio Agudo; Wolfgang Ahrens; Cristina Bosetti; Hermann Brenner; Xavier Castellsague; Chu Chen; Maria Paula Curado; Otávio A Curioni; Luigino Dal Maso; Alexander W Daudt; José F de Gois Filho; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Valeria Edefonti; Eleonora Fabianova; Leticia Fernandez; Silvia Franceschi; Maura Gillison; Richard B Hayes; Claire M Healy; Rolando Herrero; Ivana Holcatova; Vijayvel Jayaprakash; Karl Kelsey; Kristina Kjaerheim; Sergio Koifman; Carlo La Vecchia; Pagona Lagiou; Philip Lazarus; Fabio Levi; Jolanta Lissowska; Daniele Luce; Tatiana V Macfarlane; Dana Mates; Elena Matos; Michael McClean; Ana M Menezes; Gwenn Menvielle; Franco Merletti; Hal Morgenstern; Kirsten Moysich; Heiko Müller; Joshua Muscat; Andrew F Olshan; Mark P Purdue; Heribert Ramroth; Lorenzo Richiardi; Peter Rudnai; Stimson Schantz; Stephen M Schwartz; Oxana Shangina; Lorenzo Simonato; Elaine Smith; Isabelle Stucker; Erich M Sturgis; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Renato Talamini; Peter Thomson; Thomas L Vaughan; Qingyi Wei; Deborah M Winn; Victor Wunsch-Filho; Guo-Pei Yu; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Tongzhang Zheng; Ariana Znaor; Paolo Boffetta; Shu-Chun Chuang; Marianoosh Ghodrat; Yuan-Chin Amy Lee; Mia Hashibe; Paul Brennan Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 7.396