Literature DB >> 18655211

The effectiveness of the peer review process: inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie.

Lutz Bornmann1, Hans-Dieter Daniel.   

Abstract

Year:  2008        PMID： 18655211     DOI： 10.1002/anie.200800513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN： 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.

Authors:  Daniel M Herron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Insurance Companies Fighting the Peer Review Empire without any Validity: the Case for Addiction and Pain Modalities in the face of an American Drug Epidemic.

Authors:  K Blum; W Jacobs; E J Modestino; N DiNubile; D Baron; T McLaughlin; D Siwicki; I Elman; M Moran; E R Braverman; P K Thanos; R D Badgaiyan
Journal:  SEJ Surg Pain       Date:  2018-10-04

3.  The usefulness of peer review for selecting manuscripts for publication: a utility analysis taking as an example a high-impact journal.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Hans-Dieter Daniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Rüdiger Mutz; Hans-Dieter Daniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications.

Authors:  Stephen A Gallo; Joanne H Sullivan; Scott R Glisson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science.

Authors:  Kevin J Boudreau; Eva C Guinan; Karim R Lakhani; Christoph Riedl
Journal:  Manage Sci       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.883

7.  Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process.

Authors:  Alexandru Marcoci; Ans Vercammen; Martin Bush; Daniel G Hamilton; Anca Hanea; Victoria Hemming; Bonnie C Wintle; Mark Burgman; Fiona Fidler
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-04-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.