Literature DB >> 18653445

Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia: a pilot study into male perspectives on provision of Chlamydia screening in a UK university.

Rishika Chaudhary1, Catherine M Heffernan, Amy L Illsley, Laura K Jarvie, Catherine Lattimer, Anana E Nwuba, Edward W Platford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2003, the University of Leeds has been a pilot site for the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP), which offers opportunistic screening to asymptomatic people under the age of 25. Uptake among men is low. The purpose of this study is to explore perceptions and acceptability of the provision of Chlamydia screening in the University of Leeds among 18-25-year-old male students.
METHODS: Using a purposive sample of 15 male students aged between 19 and 24, two focus group sessions were conducted within university grounds.
RESULTS: Thematic analysis of the data revealed that male attitudes about Chlamydia screening were affected by: (1) lack of knowledge about Chlamydia and screening; (2) social embarrassment about Chlamydia; (3) reluctance to seek medical help; (4) perception that Chlamydia was a 'woman's disease' and (5) indifference about health promotion campaigns.
CONCLUSION: To encourage the uptake of opportunistic screening of Chlamydia, men under 25 years should be made aware of their responsibility for their own sexual health. Emphasis can also be placed on the non-invasiveness, ease and privacy of the test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18653445     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdn060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  9 in total

1.  Triggers of self-conscious emotions in the sexually transmitted infection testing process.

Authors:  Myles Balfe; Ruairi Brugha; Diarmuid O' Donovan; Emer O' Connell; Deirdre Vaughan
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-08-17

2.  Young women's decisions to accept chlamydia screening: influences of stigma and doctor-patient interactions.

Authors:  Myles Balfe; Ruairi Brugha; Diarmuid O'Donovan; Emer O'Connell; Deirdre Vaughan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Sexually transmitted infections in tribal populations of central India.

Authors:  V G Rao; A Anvikar; D Savargaonkar; J Bhat
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Graham J Hart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The SPORTSMART study: a pilot randomised controlled trial of sexually transmitted infection screening interventions targeting men in football club settings.

Authors:  Sebastian S Fuller; Catherine H Mercer; Andrew J Copas; John Saunders; Lorna J Sutcliffe; Jackie A Cassell; Graham Hart; Anne M Johnson; Tracy E Roberts; Louise J Jackson; Pamela Muniina; Claudia S Estcourt
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  What Do Men Want from a Health Screening Mobile App? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Chin Hai Teo; Chirk Jenn Ng; Alan White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Barriers to sexually transmitted infection testing in New Zealand: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hayley J Denison; Collette Bromhead; Rebecca Grainger; Elaine M Dennison; Annemarie Jutel
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.939

8.  Communication Strategies Used to Obtain Clinical Histories Before Remotely Prescribing Antibiotics for Postal Treatment of Uncomplicated Genital Chlamydia: Service Evaluation.

Authors:  Hannah McCulloch; Jonathan Syred; Gillian Holdsworth; Chris Howroyd; Elena Ardines; Paula Baraitser
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Young men's views toward the barriers and facilitators of Internet-based Chlamydia trachomatis screening: qualitative study.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Lisa McDaid
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.