Marla L Clayman1, Eric W Boberg, Gregory Makoul. 1. Center for Communication and Medicine and Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Develop a patient education program that provides accurate and easy-to-understand information for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. METHODS: To inform development of the patient education program, we conducted a longitudinal series of semi-structured interviews with 30 breast cancer patients as well as one-time interviews with 22 healthcare providers. Responses guided the study team's decisions regarding both form and content. RESULTS: We created a website (www.cancercarelinks.org) that reflects the needs expressed by patients and providers. The website is structured to answer six key questions that emerged in the interviews: What does my diagnosis mean? What will my treatment be like? Who will be involved with my treatment? What has treatment been like for others? How can I share my story with my family and friends? Where can I find more information and support? In a beta-test, 12 breast cancer patients rated the website as very clear, informative, trustworthy, useful, easy-to-understand, and easy to use. CONCLUSION: The emotional weight of a breast cancer diagnosis, coupled with the amount of disparate information available, can be overwhelming for patients. Providing clear, accurate, and tailored information is a way to meet information needs and allay fears that patients will receive "bad" information. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Combining patient and provider input with the perspectives of a multidisciplinary team resulted in a promising patient education program for women diagnosed with breast cancer. The logic of this approach has implications for developing patient education programs for a variety of clinical contexts.
OBJECTIVE: Develop a patient education program that provides accurate and easy-to-understand information for newly diagnosed breast cancerpatients. METHODS: To inform development of the patient education program, we conducted a longitudinal series of semi-structured interviews with 30 breast cancerpatients as well as one-time interviews with 22 healthcare providers. Responses guided the study team's decisions regarding both form and content. RESULTS: We created a website (www.cancercarelinks.org) that reflects the needs expressed by patients and providers. The website is structured to answer six key questions that emerged in the interviews: What does my diagnosis mean? What will my treatment be like? Who will be involved with my treatment? What has treatment been like for others? How can I share my story with my family and friends? Where can I find more information and support? In a beta-test, 12 breast cancerpatients rated the website as very clear, informative, trustworthy, useful, easy-to-understand, and easy to use. CONCLUSION: The emotional weight of a breast cancer diagnosis, coupled with the amount of disparate information available, can be overwhelming for patients. Providing clear, accurate, and tailored information is a way to meet information needs and allay fears that patients will receive "bad" information. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Combining patient and provider input with the perspectives of a multidisciplinary team resulted in a promising patient education program for women diagnosed with breast cancer. The logic of this approach has implications for developing patient education programs for a variety of clinical contexts.
Authors: Juhee Cho; Katherine C Smith; Debra Roter; Eliseo Guallar; Dong-Young Noh; Daniel E Ford Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deborah K Mayer; S Ratichek; H Berhe; S Stewart; F McTavish; D Gustafson; S K Parsons Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2009-12-06 Impact factor: 4.442