PURPOSE: This phase I trial was designed to determine the recommended phase II dose(s) of everolimus (RAD001) with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Patients receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and those not receiving EIAEDs (NEIAEDs) were studied separately. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrollment was restricted to patients with proven GBM, either newly diagnosed or at first progression. Temozolomide was administered at a starting dose of 150 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days every 28 days, and everolimus was administered continuously at a starting dose of 2.5 mg orally on a daily schedule starting on day 2 of cycle 1 in 28-day cycles. RESULTS: Thirteen patients receiving EIAEDs and 19 not receiving EIAEDs were enrolled and received 83 and 116 cycles respectively. Everolimus 10 mg daily plus TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days was declared the recommended phase II dose for the NEIAEDs cohort. In the EIAEDs group, doses were well tolerated without DLTs, and pharmacokinetic parameters indicated decreased everolimus exposure. Temozolomide pharmacokinetic parameters were unaffected by EIAEDs or everolimus. In the subset of 28 patients with measurable disease, 3 had partial responses (all NEIAEDs) and 16 had stable disease. CONCLUSION: A dosage of 10 mg everolimus daily with TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/day for five consecutive days every 28 days in patients is the recommended dose for this regimen. Everolimus clearance is increased by EIAEDs, and patients receiving EIAEDs should be switched to NEIAEDs before starting this regimen.
PURPOSE: This phase I trial was designed to determine the recommended phase II dose(s) of everolimus (RAD001) with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Patients receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and those not receiving EIAEDs (NEIAEDs) were studied separately. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrollment was restricted to patients with proven GBM, either newly diagnosed or at first progression. Temozolomide was administered at a starting dose of 150 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days every 28 days, and everolimus was administered continuously at a starting dose of 2.5 mg orally on a daily schedule starting on day 2 of cycle 1 in 28-day cycles. RESULTS: Thirteen patients receiving EIAEDs and 19 not receiving EIAEDs were enrolled and received 83 and 116 cycles respectively. Everolimus 10 mg daily plus TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days was declared the recommended phase II dose for the NEIAEDs cohort. In the EIAEDs group, doses were well tolerated without DLTs, and pharmacokinetic parameters indicated decreased everolimus exposure. Temozolomide pharmacokinetic parameters were unaffected by EIAEDs or everolimus. In the subset of 28 patients with measurable disease, 3 had partial responses (all NEIAEDs) and 16 had stable disease. CONCLUSION: A dosage of 10 mg everolimus daily with TMZ 150 mg/m(2)/day for five consecutive days every 28 days in patients is the recommended dose for this regimen. Everolimus clearance is increased by EIAEDs, and patients receiving EIAEDs should be switched to NEIAEDs before starting this regimen.
Authors: Evanthia Galanis; Jan C Buckner; Matthew J Maurer; Jeffrey I Kreisberg; Karla Ballman; J Boni; Josep M Peralba; Robert B Jenkins; Shaker R Dakhil; Roscoe F Morton; Kurt A Jaeckle; Bernd W Scheithauer; Janet Dancey; Manuel Hidalgo; Daniel J Walsh Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Anne O'Donnell; Sandrine Faivre; Howard A Burris; Daniel Rea; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Nicholas Shand; Heidi A Lane; Katharine Hazell; Ulrike Zoellner; John M Kovarik; Cathryn Brock; Suzanne Jones; Eric Raymond; Ian Judson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Andrew B Lassman; Paul S Mischel; Neal Rosen; Howard I Scher; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; David Shaffer; Eric Lis; Lauren E Abrey Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Prakash Chinnaiyan; Minhee Won; Patrick Y Wen; Amyn M Rojiani; Maria Werner-Wasik; Helen A Shih; Lynn S Ashby; Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu; Volker W Stieber; Shawn C Malone; John B Fiveash; Nimish A Mohile; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Merideth M Wendland; Philip J Stella; Andrew Y Kee; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Taemin Oh; Michael E Ivan; Matthew Z Sun; Michael Safaee; Shayan Fakurnejad; Aaron J Clark; Eli T Sayegh; Orin Bloch; Andrew T Parsa Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Daniel J Ma; Evanthia Galanis; S Keith Anderson; David Schiff; Timothy J Kaufmann; Patrick J Peller; Caterina Giannini; Paul D Brown; Joon H Uhm; Steven McGraw; Kurt A Jaeckle; Patrick J Flynn; Keith L Ligon; Jan C Buckner; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 12.300