Literature DB >> 18649256

Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility.

Montserrat Gomendio1, Eduardo R S Roldan.   

Abstract

Sperm competition is now recognised as a potent selective force shaping many male reproductive traits. While the influence of sperm competition on sperm number is widely accepted, its effects upon sperm size remain controversial. It had been traditionally assumed that there is a trade-off between sperm number and sperm size, so that an increase in sperm number would result in a decrease in sperm size, under conditions of sperm competition. Contrary to this prediction, we proposed some time ago that sperm competition favours an increase in sperm size, because longer sperm swim faster and are more likely to win the race to fertilize ova. Comparative studies between species show that in many taxa such a relationship exists, but the consequences of an increase in sperm size may vary between taxa depending on the environment in which spermatozoa have to compete. We present new evidence showing that in mammals longer sperm swim at higher speeds. We also show that mean swimming speed is highly correlated with maximum swimming speed, so even if the fastest swimming sperm are more likely to fertilize, both measures are informative. When individuals of the same species are compared, ratios between the dimensions of different sperm components, as well as the shape of the head, seem better at explaining sperm swimming velocity. Finally, we show that mean and maximum sperm swimming speed determine male fertility. Other studies have shown that in competitive contexts, males with faster swimming sperm have higher fertilization success. We conclude that the available evidence supports our original hypothesis.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18649256     DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.082595mg

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Biol        ISSN: 0214-6282            Impact factor:   2.203


  57 in total

1.  Evolution and spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Helen White-Cooper; Nina Bausek
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Linking sperm length and velocity: the importance of intramale variation.

Authors:  John L Fitzpatrick; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Patterns of genetic variation and covariation in ejaculate traits reveal potential evolutionary constraints in guppies.

Authors:  J P Evans
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Sara Calhim; Simone Immler; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes.

Authors:  John L Fitzpatrick; Robert Montgomerie; Julie K Desjardins; Kelly A Stiver; Niclas Kolm; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Rates of evolution of hominoid seminal proteins are correlated with function and expression, rather than mating system.

Authors:  S J Carnahan-Craig; M I Jensen-Seaman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Sperm competitiveness in frogs: slow and steady wins the race.

Authors:  Martin A Dziminski; J Dale Roberts; Maxine Beveridge; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Why mammalian lineages respond differently to sexual selection: metabolic rate constrains the evolution of sperm size.

Authors:  Montserrat Gomendio; Maximiliano Tourmente; Eduardo R S Roldan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sperm swimming velocity predicts competitive fertilization success in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Leigh W Simmons; Maxine Beveridge; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Competition drives cooperation among closely related sperm of deer mice.

Authors:  Heidi S Fisher; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.