Literature DB >> 18648857

The response of two butterfly species to climatic variation at the edge of their range and the implications for poleward range shifts.

Jessica J Hellmann1, Shannon L Pelini, Kirsten M Prior, Jason D K Dzurisin.   

Abstract

To predict changes in species' distributions due to climate change we must understand populations at the poleward edge of species' ranges. Ecologists generally expect range shifts under climate change caused by the expansion of edge populations as peripheral conditions increasingly resemble the range core. We tested whether peripheral populations of two contrasting butterflies, a small-bodied specialist (Erynnis propertius) and a large-bodied generalist (Papilio zelicaon), respond favorably to warmer conditions. Performance of populations related to climate was evaluated in seven peripheral populations spanning 1.2 degrees latitude (160 km) using: (1) population density surveys, an indirect measure of site suitability; and (2) organismal fitness in translocation experiments. There was evidence that population density increased with temperature for P. zelicaon whose population density declined with latitude in 1 of 3 sample years. On the other hand, E. propertius showed a positive relationship of population density with latitude, apparently unrelated to climate or measured habitat variables. Translocation experiments showed increased larval production at increased temperatures for both species, and in P. zelicaon, larval production also increased under drier conditions. These findings suggest that both species may increase at their range edge with warming but the preference for core-like conditions may be stronger in P. zelicaon. Further, populations of E. propertius at the range boundary may be large enough to act as sources of colonists for range expansions, but range expansion in this species may be prevented by a lack of available host plants further north. In total, the species appear to respond differently to climate and other factors that vary latitudinally, factors that will likely affect poleward expansion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18648857     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1112-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  27 in total

Review 1.  Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change.

Authors:  M B Davis; R G Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure.

Authors:  A J Bohonak
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  Field transplants reveal summer constraints on a butterfly range expansion.

Authors:  Lisa G Crozier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An Analysis of Local Variability of Flower Color in Linanthus Parryae.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters.

Authors:  Arndt Hampe; Rémy J Petit
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: Limitations, lessons and new directions.

Authors:  J L Bossart; D Pashley Prowell
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Winter warming facilitates range expansion: cold tolerance of the butterfly Atalopedes campestris.

Authors:  Lisa Crozier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  THE COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHY OF RECIPROCALLY SOWN POPULATIONS OF PHLOX DRUMMONDII HOOK. I. SURVIVORSHIPS, FECUNDITIES, AND FINITE RATES OF INCREASE.

Authors:  Kurt P Schmidt; Donald A Levin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. I. Sources of trait variation across a subspecies border.

Authors:  Vincent M Eckhart; Monica A Geber; Christopher M McGuire
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Negative density-distribution relationship in butterflies.

Authors:  Jussi Päivinen; Alessandro Grapputo; Veijo Kaitala; Atte Komonen; Janne S Kotiaho; Kimmo Saarinen; Niklas Wahlberg
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  10 in total

1.  Climate effects on late-season flight times of Massachusetts butterflies.

Authors:  L Zipf; E H Williams; R B Primack; S Stichter
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Population-level transcriptome sequencing of nonmodel organisms Erynnis propertius and Papilio zelicaon.

Authors:  Shawn T O'Neil; Jason D K Dzurisin; Rory D Carmichael; Neil F Lobo; Scott J Emrich; Jessica J Hellmann
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Translocation experiments with butterflies reveal limits to enhancement of poleward populations under climate change.

Authors:  Shannon L Pelini; Jason D K Dzurisin; Kirsten M Prior; Caroline M Williams; Travis D Marsico; Brent J Sinclair; Jessica J Hellmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Beyond climate envelopes: effects of weather on regional population trends in butterflies.

Authors:  Michiel F WallisDeVries; Wendy Baxter; Arnold J H Van Vliet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Thermal variability increases the impact of autumnal warming and drives metabolic depression in an overwintering butterfly.

Authors:  Caroline M Williams; Katie E Marshall; Heath A MacMillan; Jason D K Dzurisin; Jessica J Hellmann; Brent J Sinclair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Adaptations to "Thermal Time" Constraints in Papilio: Latitudinal and Local Size Clines Differ in Response to Regional Climate Change.

Authors:  J Mark Scriber; Ben Elliot; Emily Maher; Molly McGuire; Marjie Niblack
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  A macrophysiological analysis of energetic constraints on geographic range size in mammals.

Authors:  Salvatore J Agosta; Joseph Bernardo; Gerardo Ceballos; Michael A Steele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Effect of Temperature Increases on an Ant-Hemiptera-Plant Interaction.

Authors:  Katayo Sagata; Heloise Gibb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Linking ecological niche models and common garden experiments to predict phenotypic differentiation in stressful environments: Assessing the adaptive value of marginal populations in an alpine plant.

Authors:  Javier Morente-López; Jamie M Kass; Carlos Lara-Romero; Josep M Serra-Diaz; José Carmen Soto-Correa; Robert P Anderson; José M Iriondo
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 13.211

10.  Predicting future coexistence in a North American ant community.

Authors:  Sharon Bewick; Katharine L Stuble; Jean-Phillipe Lessard; Robert R Dunn; Frederick R Adler; Nathan J Sanders
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.