Literature DB >> 15278427

Field transplants reveal summer constraints on a butterfly range expansion.

Lisa G Crozier1.   

Abstract

The geographic ranges of most species are expected to shift to higher elevations and latitudes in response to global warming. But species react to specific environmental changes in individualistic ways, and we are far from a detailed understanding of range-shifts. Summer temperature often limits the ranges of insects and plants, so many range-shifts are expected to track summer warming. I explore this potential range-limiting factor in a case study of a northwardly expanding American butterfly, Atalopedes campestris (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). This species has recently colonized the Pacific Northwest, USA, where the mean annual temperature has risen 0.8-1.8 degrees C over the past 100 years. Using field transplant experiments across the current range edge, I measured development time, survivorship, fecundity and predation rates along a naturally occurring thermal gradient of 3 degrees C. Development time was significantly slower outside the current range in eastern Washington (WA), as expected because of cooler temperatures there. Slower development would reduce the number of generations possible per year outside the current range, dramatically lowering the probability that a population could survive there. Differences in survivorship, fecundity and predation rate across the range edge were not significant. The interaction between summer and winter temperature appears to be crucial in defining the current range limit. The estimated difference in temperature required to affect the number of generations is greater than the extent of summer warming observed over the past century, however, and thus historically winter temperature alone probably limited the range in southeastern WA. Nonetheless, extraordinarily warm summers may have improved colonization success, increasing the probability of a range expansion. These results suggest that extreme climatic events may influence rates of response to long-term climate change. They also demonstrate that range-limiting factors can change over time, and that the asymmetry in seasonal warming trends will have biological consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15278427     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1634-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Physiological variation in insects: large-scale patterns and their implications.

Authors:  S L Chown; A Addo-Bediako; K J Gaston
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Climate change hastens population extinctions.

Authors:  John F McLaughlin; Jessica J Hellmann; Carol L Boggs; Paul R Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants.

Authors:  Terry L Root; Jeff T Price; Kimberly R Hall; Stephen H Schneider; Cynthia Rosenzweig; J Alan Pounds
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Species borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; M W Blows
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Extinction, reduction, stability and increase: The responses of checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas) populations to the California drought.

Authors:  P R Ehrlich; D D Murphy; M C Singer; C B Sherwood; R R White; I L Brown
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  ECTOTHERMS FOLLOW THE CONVERSE TO BERGMANN'S RULE.

Authors:  Timothy A Mousseau
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Winter warming facilitates range expansion: cold tolerance of the butterfly Atalopedes campestris.

Authors:  Lisa Crozier
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cross-habitat variation in the phenology of a colonial spider: insights from a reciprocal transplant study.

Authors:  Florencia Fernández Campón
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-03

3.  The response of two butterfly species to climatic variation at the edge of their range and the implications for poleward range shifts.

Authors:  Jessica J Hellmann; Shannon L Pelini; Kirsten M Prior; Jason D K Dzurisin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change.

Authors:  Carla M Sgrò; Andrew J Lowe; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 5.  Climate-Driven Reshuffling of Species and Genes: Potential Conservation Roles for Species Translocations and Recombinant Hybrid Genotypes.

Authors:  Jon Mark Scriber
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  A macrophysiological analysis of energetic constraints on geographic range size in mammals.

Authors:  Salvatore J Agosta; Joseph Bernardo; Gerardo Ceballos; Michael A Steele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Performance of forest bryophytes with different geographical distributions transplanted across a topographically heterogeneous landscape.

Authors:  C Johan Dahlberg; Johan Ehrlén; Kristoffer Hylander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Moving forward in global-change ecology: capitalizing on natural variability.

Authors:  Inés Ibáñez; Elise S Gornish; Lauren Buckley; Diane M Debinski; Jessica Hellmann; Brian Helmuth; Janneke Hillerislambers; Andrew M Latimer; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Maria Uriarte
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Physiological Limits along an Elevational Gradient in a Radiation of Montane Ground Beetles.

Authors:  Rachel A Slatyer; Sean D Schoville
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.