Literature DB >> 18648601

Radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro, hormesis and risk assessment.

J Leslie Redpath1, Eugene Elmore.   

Abstract

Dose-response curves for various low-LET radiation sources have consistently been demonstrated to be J-shaped for the cancer-relevant endpoint of neoplastic transformation in vitro. Most of these studies have been performed where the radiation has been delivered at intermediate to high dose-rates (30-3000 mGy/min), where the threshold dose for induction of neoplastic transformation is around 100-200 mGy. Below these doses, the transformation frequency is less than that seen spontaneously, indicative of a hormetic effect. More recently, data have been obtained for low dose rates (<0.5 mGy/min) of low-LET radiation, and again hormetic effects are apparent but with threshold doses now being >1000 mGy. Similar trends have been reported in animal experiments as well as in human epidemiologic studies. Indeed, the relative risks for induction of neoplastic transformation in vitro in the dose range 1 to 1000 mGy agree well with those for incidence of radiation-induced breast cancer and leukemia in humans. These findings support the notion that the endpoint of neoplastic transformation in vitro is a plausible endpoint to not only study mechanisms involved in response to low doses of radiation, but also to provide information of potential importance to risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hormesis; low dose; neoplastic transformation; radiation; risk assessment

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648601      PMCID: PMC2477692          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-010.Redpath

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  29 in total

1.  Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Further study of prolongation of life span associated with immunological modification by chronic low-dose-rate irradiation in MRL-lpr/lpr mice: effects of whole-life irradiation.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ina; Kazuo Sakai
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

4.  Loss of suppressor loci on chromosomes 11 and 14 may be required for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation of HeLa x skin fibroblast human cell hybrids.

Authors:  M S Mendonca; K Howard; C L Fasching; D L Farrington; L A Desmond; E J Stanbridge; J L Redpath
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Influence of gamma irradiation on the development of neoplastic disease in mice. III. Dose-rate effects.

Authors:  R L Ullrich; J B Storer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; D P Morrison; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Mechanisms of suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  M C Pant; X-Y Liao; Q Lu; S Molloi; E Elmore; J L Redpath
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Curvature in the cancer mortality dose response in Japanese atomic bomb survivors: absence of evidence of threshold.

Authors:  M P Little; C R Muirhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Neoplastic transformation of human hybrid cells by gamma radiation: a quantitative assay.

Authors:  J L Redpath; C Sun; M Colman; E J Stanbridge
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  13 in total

1.  A stochastic markov model of cellular response to radiation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Marek Krzysztof Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Computational modeling of cellular effects post-irradiation with low- and high-let particles and different absorbed doses.

Authors:  Adriana Alexandre S Tavares; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  The new radiobiology: returning to our roots.

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Vittorio Calabrese; Carolin Cornelius; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Edward J Calabrese; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Immunological mechanism of the low-dose radiation-induced suppression of cancer metastases in a mouse model.

Authors:  Ewa M Nowosielska; Aneta Cheda; Jolanta Wrembel-Wargocka; Marek K Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part II - Influence from Combined Adaptive Response and Bystander Effects - A Microdose Analysis.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard; Richard E Thompson; Georgia C Beecher
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.