Literature DB >> 18648566

Health effects of low level radiation: when will we acknowledge the reality?

J M Cuttler1.   

Abstract

The 1986 April 26th Chernobyl event was the worst nuclear power accident--it killed 31 people. Its significance was exaggerated immensely because of the pervasive fear of ionizing radiation that has been indoctrinated in all of humanity. In reality, our environment includes radiation from natural sources, varying widely in intensity, to which all living things have adapted. The effect of radiation on organisms is primarily on their damage control biosystem, which prevents, repairs and removes cell damage. Low doses stimulate this system, while high doses inhibit it. So low doses decrease the incidences of cancer and congenital malformations; high doses have the opposite effect. Efforts by radiation protection organizations to lower exposures to (human-made) radiation to as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) provide no benefit. They only create inappropriate fear-barriers to very important applications of nuclear technology in energy production and medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chernobyl; LNT hypothesis; radiation hormesis

Year:  2007        PMID: 18648566      PMCID: PMC2477717          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.07-015.Cuttler

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  15 in total

Review 1.  Radiation hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis.

Authors:  E J Calabrese; L A Baldwin
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Radiation increased the longevity of British radiologists.

Authors:  J R Cameron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Historical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right.

Authors:  E J Calabrese
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 1.770

5.  What becomes of nuclear risk assessment in light of radiation hormesis?

Authors:  Jerry M Cuttler
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Test of the linear-no threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis for inhaled radon decay products.

Authors:  B L Cohen
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Mortality from cancer and all causes among British radiologists.

Authors:  P G Smith; R Doll
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Low doses of radiation reduce risk in vivo.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Radiobiological basis of low-dose irradiation in prevention and therapy of cancer.

Authors:  Myron Pollycove
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Nonlinear dose-response relationship in the immune system following exposure to ionizing radiation: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Shu-Zheng Liu
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  The emerging low-dose therapy for advanced cancers.

Authors:  Jahangir Satti
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Radiation-stimulated epigenetic reprogramming of adaptive-response genes in the lung: an evolutionary gift for mounting adaptive protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Steven A Belinsky; Shuguang Leng; Yong Lin; Julie A Wilder; Leah A Damiani
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Response to Baverstock, K. Comments on Rithidech, K.N.; et al. Lack of Genomic Instability in Bone Marrow Cells of SCID Mice Exposed Whole-Body to Low-Dose Radiation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 1356-1377.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Chatchanok Udomtanakunchai; Louise Honikel; Elbert Whorton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.