K O Pryor1, R A Veselis, R A Reinsel, V A Feshchenko. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. kopryor@yahoo.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emotional information has the ability to alter the formation and strength of a memory ('memory modulation'). Memory modulation by negative emotion is mediated by the amygdala. It is not known how gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic drugs affect the processes involved in memory modulation. This study investigates whether memory for negative emotional stimuli is more refractory to the effects of GABAergic drugs. METHODS:Eighty-three healthy volunteers were shown a randomized sequence of 60 visual stimuli consisting of negative, positive and neutral emotive pictures, while receiving a controlled infusion of thiopental (n=31), propofol (n=31), dexmedetomidine (n=10) or placebo (n=11). After a 5 h retention interval, when drug concentration was negligible, subjects performed a recognition task with 'old' pictures randomly mixed with 'new' pictures. Drug effect was calculated as the proportionate reduction in recognition for images of each emotional valence. RESULTS:Forty-eight subjects were included in a within-subject logistic dose-response model analysis. In the thiopental group there was a smaller drug effect seen for negative vs positive images (proportional memory reduction from baseline 0.27 (SD 0.20) vs 0.56 (0.25), P<0.001, n=20 included in analysis). A similar trend was seen in the propofol group (0.25 (0.28) vs 0.54 (0.30), n=10), but this did not attain statistical significance. No trend was seen in the dexmedetomidine group (0.33 (0.26) vs 0.24 (0.22), n=7). CONCLUSIONS: Over a specific dose range of thiopental (target serum concentration 2-7 micro g ml(-1)), impairment of explicit memory for images with negative emotional valence is less than that for images with positive emotional valence. There is a strong possibility that propofol (target serum concentration 0.3-2.4 micro g ml(-1)) causes a similar effect. Modulation of visual memory by negative emotional content continues at sub-anaesthetic concentrations of GABAergic drugs associated with explicit memory impairment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Emotional information has the ability to alter the formation and strength of a memory ('memory modulation'). Memory modulation by negative emotion is mediated by the amygdala. It is not known how gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic drugs affect the processes involved in memory modulation. This study investigates whether memory for negative emotional stimuli is more refractory to the effects of GABAergic drugs. METHODS: Eighty-three healthy volunteers were shown a randomized sequence of 60 visual stimuli consisting of negative, positive and neutral emotive pictures, while receiving a controlled infusion of thiopental (n=31), propofol (n=31), dexmedetomidine (n=10) or placebo (n=11). After a 5 h retention interval, when drug concentration was negligible, subjects performed a recognition task with 'old' pictures randomly mixed with 'new' pictures. Drug effect was calculated as the proportionate reduction in recognition for images of each emotional valence. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were included in a within-subject logistic dose-response model analysis. In the thiopental group there was a smaller drug effect seen for negative vs positive images (proportional memory reduction from baseline 0.27 (SD 0.20) vs 0.56 (0.25), P<0.001, n=20 included in analysis). A similar trend was seen in the propofol group (0.25 (0.28) vs 0.54 (0.30), n=10), but this did not attain statistical significance. No trend was seen in the dexmedetomidine group (0.33 (0.26) vs 0.24 (0.22), n=7). CONCLUSIONS: Over a specific dose range of thiopental (target serum concentration 2-7 micro g ml(-1)), impairment of explicit memory for images with negative emotional valence is less than that for images with positive emotional valence. There is a strong possibility that propofol (target serum concentration 0.3-2.4 micro g ml(-1)) causes a similar effect. Modulation of visual memory by negative emotional content continues at sub-anaesthetic concentrations of GABAergic drugs associated with explicit memory impairment.
Authors: Samuel R Chamberlain; Ulrich Müller; Andrew D Blackwell; Trevor W Robbins; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Meghana Mehta; Yuelin Li; John T Wixted; Robert A Veselis Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: K P Mason; E R Kelhoffer; R Prescilla; M Mehta; J C Root; V J Young; F Robinson; R A Veselis Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Robert Veselis; Eric Kelhoffer; Meghana Mehta; James C Root; Fay Robinson; Keira P Mason Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Matthew I Banks; Bryan M Krause; Christopher M Endemann; Declan I Campbell; Christopher K Kovach; Mark Eric Dyken; Hiroto Kawasaki; Kirill V Nourski Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Robert A Veselis; Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Meghana Mehta; Hong Pan; Ray Johnson Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Robert A Veselis; Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Yuelin Li; Meghana Mehta; Ray Johnson Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Anna Hadjihambi; Anastassios Karagiannis; Shefeeq M Theparambil; Gareth L Ackland; Alexander V Gourine Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 5.195