Literature DB >> 15220170

Enhanced visual memory effect for negative versus positive emotional content is potentiated at sub-anaesthetic concentrations of thiopental.

K O Pryor1, R A Veselis, R A Reinsel, V A Feshchenko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emotional information has the ability to alter the formation and strength of a memory ('memory modulation'). Memory modulation by negative emotion is mediated by the amygdala. It is not known how gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic drugs affect the processes involved in memory modulation. This study investigates whether memory for negative emotional stimuli is more refractory to the effects of GABAergic drugs.
METHODS: Eighty-three healthy volunteers were shown a randomized sequence of 60 visual stimuli consisting of negative, positive and neutral emotive pictures, while receiving a controlled infusion of thiopental (n=31), propofol (n=31), dexmedetomidine (n=10) or placebo (n=11). After a 5 h retention interval, when drug concentration was negligible, subjects performed a recognition task with 'old' pictures randomly mixed with 'new' pictures. Drug effect was calculated as the proportionate reduction in recognition for images of each emotional valence.
RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were included in a within-subject logistic dose-response model analysis. In the thiopental group there was a smaller drug effect seen for negative vs positive images (proportional memory reduction from baseline 0.27 (SD 0.20) vs 0.56 (0.25), P<0.001, n=20 included in analysis). A similar trend was seen in the propofol group (0.25 (0.28) vs 0.54 (0.30), n=10), but this did not attain statistical significance. No trend was seen in the dexmedetomidine group (0.33 (0.26) vs 0.24 (0.22), n=7).
CONCLUSIONS: Over a specific dose range of thiopental (target serum concentration 2-7 micro g ml(-1)), impairment of explicit memory for images with negative emotional valence is less than that for images with positive emotional valence. There is a strong possibility that propofol (target serum concentration 0.3-2.4 micro g ml(-1)) causes a similar effect. Modulation of visual memory by negative emotional content continues at sub-anaesthetic concentrations of GABAergic drugs associated with explicit memory impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220170     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  9 in total

Review 1.  Noradrenergic modulation of working memory and emotional memory in humans.

Authors:  Samuel R Chamberlain; Ulrich Müller; Andrew D Blackwell; Trevor W Robbins; Barbara J Sahakian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Visual P2-N2 complex and arousal at the time of encoding predict the time domain characteristics of amnesia for multiple intravenous anesthetic drugs in humans.

Authors:  Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Meghana Mehta; Yuelin Li; John T Wixted; Robert A Veselis
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Feasibility of measuring memory response to increasing dexmedetomidine sedation in children.

Authors:  K P Mason; E R Kelhoffer; R Prescilla; M Mehta; J C Root; V J Young; F Robinson; R A Veselis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Propofol sedation in children: sleep trumps amnesia.

Authors:  Robert Veselis; Eric Kelhoffer; Meghana Mehta; James C Root; Fay Robinson; Keira P Mason
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Cortical functional connectivity indexes arousal state during sleep and anesthesia.

Authors:  Matthew I Banks; Bryan M Krause; Christopher M Endemann; Declan I Campbell; Christopher K Kovach; Mark Eric Dyken; Hiroto Kawasaki; Kirill V Nourski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Low-dose propofol-induced amnesia is not due to a failure of encoding: left inferior prefrontal cortex is still active.

Authors:  Robert A Veselis; Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Meghana Mehta; Hong Pan; Ray Johnson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Propofol and midazolam inhibit conscious memory processes very soon after encoding: an event-related potential study of familiarity and recollection in volunteers.

Authors:  Robert A Veselis; Kane O Pryor; Ruth A Reinsel; Yuelin Li; Meghana Mehta; Ray Johnson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  At clinically relevant concentrations the anaesthetic/amnesic thiopental but not the anticonvulsant phenobarbital interferes with hippocampal sharp wave-ripple complexes.

Authors:  Costas Papatheodoropoulos; Evangelos Sotiriou; Dimitrios Kotzadimitriou; Panagiota Drimala
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  The effect of general anaesthetics on brain lactate release.

Authors:  Anna Hadjihambi; Anastassios Karagiannis; Shefeeq M Theparambil; Gareth L Ackland; Alexander V Gourine
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.195

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.