Literature DB >> 18647291

The Soft Seal disposable laryngeal mask airway in adults: comparison of two insertion techniques without intra-oral manipulation.

B Kuvaki1, S Küçükgüçlü, L Iyilikçi, B E Tuncali, O Cinar.   

Abstract

We investigated whether insertion of the disposable Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway (SSLM) was successful without intra-oral digital manipulation. One hundred patients undergoing anaesthesia using the SSLM were randomly assigned into two groups. Insertion was performed by either a direct or a rotational technique, both without intra-oral digital manipulation. The primary outcome measure was successful insertion at first attempt. Other outcomes included insertion time, fibreoptic assessment of the airway view and airway morbidity. The first attempt success rate was higher (98%) with the direct technique than with the rotational technique (75%; p = 0.002) but insertion time was faster with the latter method (mean [range] 15 [8-50] s) than with the direct method (20 [8-56] s; p = 0.035). Fibreoptic assessment and airway morbidity were similar in both groups. We conclude that the SSLM can be successfully inserted without intra-oral digital manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18647291     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05566.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Air-QⓇ insertion techniques in pediatric patients with fiber-optic bronchoscopic assessment: a prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Manasa Gaddam; Sameer Sethi; Aditi Jain; Vikas Saini
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-06-04

2.  Insertion of LMA Classic™ with and without digital intraoral manipulation in anesthetized unparalyzed patients.

Authors:  Handattu M Krishna; Shyamsunder Kamath; Laxmi Shenoy
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10

Review 3.  Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Ha Park; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Jin Wu Ju; Min Soo Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.