BACKGROUND: Estimates of the prevalence of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vary in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: HIV clinic patients were prospectively cultured. Bilateral nasal and axillary swabs were plated on BBL CHROMagar MRSA media. Molecular typing was done by pulse-field gel electrophoresis, and staphylococcal cassette chromosomemec typing was determined. A patient questionnaire was conducted to ascertain potential MRSA risk factors; medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen of 146 (10.3%) patients had MRSA nasal colonization; 1 also had axillary colonization. Twelve of 15 isolates were staphylococcal cassette chromosomemec type IV, and 8 of 14 were USA300 or USA400 genotype. MRSA colonization was associated with lower CD4 cell count, not receiving current or recent antibiotics, history of prior MRSA or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection (P < 0.05 for all), and a trend toward history of hospitalization or emergency department visit in the past year (P = 0.064). Current use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was protective for colonization: 0 of 29 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole recipients were colonized versus 15 of 117 nonrecipients, P = 0.04. In a multivariate logistic regression model, prior infection with either methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (odds ratio = 32.4, 95% confidence interval 3.04 to 345.42) or MRSA (odds ratio = 9.71, 95% confidence interval 2.20 to 43.01), not receiving current or recent antibiotics (odds ratio = 0.026, 95% confidence interval 0.002 to 0.412), and lower CD4 count (odds ratio 0.996, 95% confidence interval 0.992 to 0.999) were associated with MRSA colonization. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization was relatively high compared with prior studies; axillary colonization was rare. Prior staphylococcal infection (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus or MRSA), not receiving antibiotics, and lower CD4 count were associated with MRSA nasal colonization. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole seemed to be protective of MRSA colonization.
BACKGROUND: Estimates of the prevalence of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vary in HIV-infectedpatients. METHODS: HIV clinic patients were prospectively cultured. Bilateral nasal and axillary swabs were plated on BBL CHROMagar MRSA media. Molecular typing was done by pulse-field gel electrophoresis, and staphylococcal cassette chromosomemec typing was determined. A patient questionnaire was conducted to ascertain potential MRSA risk factors; medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen of 146 (10.3%) patients had MRSA nasal colonization; 1 also had axillary colonization. Twelve of 15 isolates were staphylococcal cassette chromosomemec type IV, and 8 of 14 were USA300 or USA400 genotype. MRSA colonization was associated with lower CD4 cell count, not receiving current or recent antibiotics, history of prior MRSA or methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection (P < 0.05 for all), and a trend toward history of hospitalization or emergency department visit in the past year (P = 0.064). Current use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was protective for colonization: 0 of 29 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole recipients were colonized versus 15 of 117 nonrecipients, P = 0.04. In a multivariate logistic regression model, prior infection with either methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (odds ratio = 32.4, 95% confidence interval 3.04 to 345.42) or MRSA (odds ratio = 9.71, 95% confidence interval 2.20 to 43.01), not receiving current or recent antibiotics (odds ratio = 0.026, 95% confidence interval 0.002 to 0.412), and lower CD4 count (odds ratio 0.996, 95% confidence interval 0.992 to 0.999) were associated with MRSA colonization. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization was relatively high compared with prior studies; axillary colonization was rare. Prior staphylococcal infection (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus or MRSA), not receiving antibiotics, and lower CD4 count were associated with MRSA nasal colonization. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole seemed to be protective of MRSA colonization.
Authors: Michael J A Reid; Rebecca S B Fischer; Naledi Mannathoko; Charles Muthoga; Erin McHugh; Heather Essigmann; Eric L Brown; Andrew P Steenhoff Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: S K McAllister; V S Albrecht; G E Fosheim; H K Lowery; P J Peters; R Gorwitz; J L Guest; J Hageman; R Mindley; L K McDougal; D Rimland; B Limbago Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Philip J Peters; John T Brooks; Sigrid K McAllister; Brandi Limbago; H Ken Lowery; Gregory Fosheim; Jodie L Guest; Rachel J Gorwitz; Monique Bethea; Jeffrey Hageman; Rondeen Mindley; Linda K McDougal; David Rimland Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 6.883