BACKGROUND: The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is frequently used to assess cognition in studies of late-life depression (LLD). However, its sensitivity and specificity in this population are largely unknown. We undertook an analysis of subjects with LLD and hypothesized that: (1) at the traditional cutoff of 24, the MMSE would have low sensitivity in the detection of cognitive impairment; (2) increasing the cutoff score would improve this sensitivity at the expense of a minimal reduction in specificity. METHODS: We analyzed the MMSE scores of 447 non-demented subjects with LLD using the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) as the gold standard for cognitive function. RESULTS: Using the DRS raw total cutoff of 132 as the "gold standard", the MMSE at a cutoff of 24 has a sensitivity of 8.0% and a specificity of 99.4% in detecting "cognitively impaired" depressed elders. A receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrates that with an MMSE cutoff of 27 instead of 24, its sensitivity more than quadruples and increases to 37.5% while its specificity decreases minimally from 99.4% to 91.3%. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample almost all of those classified as cognitively impaired by the DRS are mislabelled as "cognitively intact" by the MMSE. By using a higher cutoff score, the sensitivity can be increased with a minimal reduction in specificity. Our findings have significant implications for those who study or treat persons with LLD or other neuropsychiatric disorders.
BACKGROUND: The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is frequently used to assess cognition in studies of late-life depression (LLD). However, its sensitivity and specificity in this population are largely unknown. We undertook an analysis of subjects with LLD and hypothesized that: (1) at the traditional cutoff of 24, the MMSE would have low sensitivity in the detection of cognitive impairment; (2) increasing the cutoff score would improve this sensitivity at the expense of a minimal reduction in specificity. METHODS: We analyzed the MMSE scores of 447 non-demented subjects with LLD using the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) as the gold standard for cognitive function. RESULTS: Using the DRS raw total cutoff of 132 as the "gold standard", the MMSE at a cutoff of 24 has a sensitivity of 8.0% and a specificity of 99.4% in detecting "cognitively impaired" depressed elders. A receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrates that with an MMSE cutoff of 27 instead of 24, its sensitivity more than quadruples and increases to 37.5% while its specificity decreases minimally from 99.4% to 91.3%. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample almost all of those classified as cognitively impaired by the DRS are mislabelled as "cognitively intact" by the MMSE. By using a higher cutoff score, the sensitivity can be increased with a minimal reduction in specificity. Our findings have significant implications for those who study or treat persons with LLD or other neuropsychiatric disorders.
Authors: M A Butters; J T Becker; R D Nebes; M D Zmuda; B H Mulsant; B G Pollock; C F Reynolds Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: B H Mulsant; B G Pollock; R Nebes; M D Miller; R A Sweet; J Stack; P R Houck; S Bensasi; S Mazumdar; C F Reynolds Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2001 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Lon S Schneider; J Craig Nelson; Cathryn M Clary; Paul Newhouse; K Ranga Rama Krishnan; Thomas Shiovitz; Karen Weihs Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Meryl A Butters; Ellen M Whyte; Robert D Nebes; Amy E Begley; Mary Amanda Dew; Benoit H Mulsant; Michelle D Zmuda; Rishi Bhalla; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Bruce G Pollock; Charles F Reynolds; James T Becker Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2004-06
Authors: Mark Hyman Rapaport; Lon S Schneider; David L Dunner; John T Davies; Cornelius D Pitts Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: T Ones; I Midi; F Dede; N Tuncer; T Y Erdil; O Onultan; S Ceylan; S Inanir; H T Turoglu Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Ariel Gildengers; Curtis Tatsuoka; Christopher Bialko; Kristin A Cassidy; Philipp Dines; James Emanuel; Rayan K Al Jurdi; Laszlo Gyulai; Benoit H Mulsant; Robert C Young; Martha Sajatovic Journal: Cut Edge Psychiatry Pract Date: 2013
Authors: Ariel G Gildengers; Benoit H Mulsant; Rayan K Al Jurdi; John L Beyer; Rebecca L Greenberg; Laszlo Gyulai; Paul J Moberg; Martha Sajatovic; Thomas ten Have; Robert C Young Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Patricia Marino; Herbert C Schulberg; Ariel G Gildengers; Benoit H Mulsant; Martha Sajatovic; Laszlo Gyulai; Rayan K Aljurdi; Laurie Davan Evans; Samprit Banerjee; Ruben C Gur; Robert C Young Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-05-22 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Helene M Altmann; Joseph Kazan; Marie Anne Gebara; Daniel M Blumberger; Jordan F Karp; Eric J Lenze; Benoit H Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds; Sarah T Stahl Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Ariel G Gildengers; Benoit H Mulsant; Amy Begley; Sati Mazumdar; Adriana V Hyams; Charles F Reynolds Iii; David J Kupfer; Meryl A Butters Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Jordan Weiss; Amanda R Rabinowitz; Sameer K Deshpande; Raiden B Hasegawa; Dylan S Small Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 5.363