BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a method which is used to identify the angiographically intermediate lesions requiring revascularization. However, physiological importance and clinical usability of delta (Delta) FFR, the difference between FFR in baseline conditions (FFRbase, resting) and after adenosine administration (FFRmin, hyperemic), is currently unknown. We aimed to investigate whether DeltaFFR may be helpful in the identification of the lesion severity and predictability of long-term prognosis. METHOD AND RESULTS: We enrolled 123 consecutive patients with an intermediate lesion (40-70% stenosis) at LAD in this study. The patients were divided into three groups according to FFRmin results (group I: FFR>0.80, n=71; group II: FFR between 0.75 and 0.80, n=28; group III: FFR<0.75, n=24). We followed the patients for a mean duration of 36+/-17 months for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). For the sensitivity and the specificity of DeltaFFR to detect the lesion severity, the area under ROC curve was found as 0.873 (95% CI: 0.788-0.958, P<0.001). When >or=15 is accepted as the cut-off value for DeltaFFR, the specificity was 95%, the sensitivity was 59% for lesion severity. When we compared the predictability of MACE by FFRmin and DeltaFFR, there is no difference in FFRmin groups (FFR<0.75, 0.75-0.80 and FFR>0.80) (29%, 46% and 30%, respectively, P=0.247). However, between the groups which were determined according to cut-off values for DeltaFFR (DeltaFFR<10; DeltaFFR, 10-15; DeltaFFR>or=15) among the patients with FFR<or=0.80, MACE was significantly different (73%, 44%, 11%; respectively, P=0.003). CONCLUSION: DeltaFFR may represent the vascular ischemic compensatory capacity to a significant lesion and this response capacity shows the severity of the lesion with high specificity. Decreased and insufficient vascular response capacity to a significantly lesion relates to the poor long-term clinical prognosis. DeltaFFR may be helpful in the identification of the lesion severity in the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions; it can be used as a guide for revascularization decision and in predictability of long-term clinical prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a method which is used to identify the angiographically intermediate lesions requiring revascularization. However, physiological importance and clinical usability of delta (Delta) FFR, the difference between FFR in baseline conditions (FFRbase, resting) and after adenosine administration (FFRmin, hyperemic), is currently unknown. We aimed to investigate whether DeltaFFR may be helpful in the identification of the lesion severity and predictability of long-term prognosis. METHOD AND RESULTS: We enrolled 123 consecutive patients with an intermediate lesion (40-70% stenosis) at LAD in this study. The patients were divided into three groups according to FFRmin results (group I: FFR>0.80, n=71; group II: FFR between 0.75 and 0.80, n=28; group III: FFR<0.75, n=24). We followed the patients for a mean duration of 36+/-17 months for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). For the sensitivity and the specificity of DeltaFFR to detect the lesion severity, the area under ROC curve was found as 0.873 (95% CI: 0.788-0.958, P<0.001). When >or=15 is accepted as the cut-off value for DeltaFFR, the specificity was 95%, the sensitivity was 59% for lesion severity. When we compared the predictability of MACE by FFRmin and DeltaFFR, there is no difference in FFRmin groups (FFR<0.75, 0.75-0.80 and FFR>0.80) (29%, 46% and 30%, respectively, P=0.247). However, between the groups which were determined according to cut-off values for DeltaFFR (DeltaFFR<10; DeltaFFR, 10-15; DeltaFFR>or=15) among the patients with FFR<or=0.80, MACE was significantly different (73%, 44%, 11%; respectively, P=0.003). CONCLUSION: DeltaFFR may represent the vascular ischemic compensatory capacity to a significant lesion and this response capacity shows the severity of the lesion with high specificity. Decreased and insufficient vascular response capacity to a significantly lesion relates to the poor long-term clinical prognosis. DeltaFFR may be helpful in the identification of the lesion severity in the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions; it can be used as a guide for revascularization decision and in predictability of long-term clinical prognosis.
Authors: Stephane Fournier; Giovanni Ciccarelli; Gabor G Toth; Anastasios Milkas; Panagiotis Xaplanteris; Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Nico H J Pijls; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Vahid Eslami; Morteza Safi; Mohammad Hasan Namazi; Mehdi Pishgahi; Amir Eftekharzade; Sayyed Ali Eftekharzadeh Journal: Galen Med J Date: 2020-10-03
Authors: Jun-Hyok Oh; Changhoon Kim; Jinhee Ahn; Jin Hee Kim; Mi Jin Yang; Hye Won Lee; Jung Hyun Choi; Han Cheol Lee; Kwang Soo Cha; Taek Jong Hong Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 3.243