Literature DB >> 21805603

Pressure-wire based assessment of microvascular resistance using calibrated upstream balloon obstruction: a predictor of myocardial viability.

June-Hong Kim1, Ju-Hyun Park, Kiseok Choo, Sung-Kook Song, Jung-Su Kim, Young-Hyun Park, Jun Kim, Kook-Jin Chun, Dongcheul Han, Anthony Z Faranesh, Robert J Lederman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assess microvascular integrity as a marker of myocardial viability after coronary stenting, using only a pressure guidewire.
BACKGROUND: Microvascular integrity generally is not assessed using pressure-only guidewires because the transducer lies upstream of microvasculature. We partially inflate a balloon inside a coronary stent to achieve a specific normalized pressure drop at rest (distal coronary/aortic pressure = 0.8) and then infuse a vasodilator, to render the wire sensitive to microvascular function. We hypothesize that the further decline in pressure (ΔFFR(0.8) ) predicts MRI myocardial viability.
METHODS: We studied 29 subjects with acute coronary syndrome including myocardial infarction. After successful culprit stenting, the resting coronary/aortic pressure was set to 0.8 using temporary balloon obstruction. ΔFFR(0.8) was defined as 0.8-(distal coronary/aortic pressures) during adenosine-induced hyperemia. The average transmural extent of infarction was defined as the average area of MRI late gadolinium enhancement (after 2.8 ± 1.5 days) divided by the corresponding full thickness of the gadolinium enhanced sector in short axis slices, and was compared with ΔFFR(0.8) .
RESULTS: ΔFFR(0.8) corresponded inversely and linearly with the average transmural extent of infarction (r(2) = 0.65, P < 0.001). We found that a transmural extent of infarction of 0.50 corresponded to a ΔFFR(0.8) threshold of 0.1, and had high sensitivity and specificity (100% and 94.4%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Using only an upstream pressure-sensitive guidewire and a partially obstructing balloon during pharmacologic hyperemia, we were able to predict MRI myocardial viability with high accuracy after relief of epicardial stenosis. With further validation, this may prove a useful clinical prognostic tool after percutaneous intervention.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21805603      PMCID: PMC3448879          DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  22 in total

1.  Coronary blood flow reserve and wall motion recovery in patients undergoing angioplasty for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E Teiger; J Garot; E Aptecar; P Bosio; J Woscoboinik; J M Pernes; P Gueret; M Kern; J L Dubois-Randé; P Dupouy
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Martin K C Ng; Alan C Yeung; William F Fearon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; J Bartunek; K Kulecki; J W Bech; H De Winter; P Van Crombrugge; G R Heyndrickx; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology.

Authors:  Morton J Kern; Amir Lerman; Jan-Willen Bech; Bernard De Bruyne; Eric Eeckhout; William F Fearon; Stuart T Higano; Michael J Lim; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek; Nico H J Pijls; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Pressure-derived measurement of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Philip MacCarthy; Alexandre Berger; Ganesh Manoharan; Jozef Bartunek; Emanuele Barbato; William Wijns; Guy R Heyndrickx; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.

Authors:  R J Kim; E Wu; A Rafael; E L Chen; M A Parker; O Simonetti; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Wilbert Aarnoudse; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Leora B Balsam; David T Cooke; Robert C Robbins; Peter J Fitzgerald; Alan C Yeung; Paul G Yock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve by coronary pressure measurement: comparison with flow- or velocity-derived coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Takashi Akasaka; Atsushi Yamamuro; Norio Kamiyama; Yuji Koyama; Maki Akiyama; Nozomi Watanabe; Yoji Neishi; Tsutomu Takagi; Evgeny Shalman; Chen Barak; Kiyoshi Yoshida
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Wilbert Aarnoudse; William F Fearon; Ganesh Manoharan; Maartje Geven; Frans van de Vosse; Marcel Rutten; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic value of microvascular resistance and its association to fractional flow reserve: a DEFINE-FLOW substudy.

Authors:  Ashkan Eftekhari; Jelmer Westra; Valérie Stegehuis; Niels Ramsing Holm; Tim P van de Hoef; Richard L Kirkeeide; Jan J Piek; K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson; Evald Høj Christiansen
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-04

2.  Prediction of Fractional Flow Reserve without Hyperemic Induction Based on Resting Baseline Pd/Pa.

Authors:  Jeong Su Kim; Heon Deok Lee; Yong Kweon Suh; June Hong Kim; Kook Jin Chun; Yong Hyun Park; Jun Kim; Dong Cheul Han; Chang Bae Sohn
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  The Relationship between Microcirculatory Resistance and Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Jun-Hyok Oh; Changhoon Kim; Jinhee Ahn; Jin Hee Kim; Mi Jin Yang; Hye Won Lee; Jung Hyun Choi; Han Cheol Lee; Kwang Soo Cha; Taek Jong Hong
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.243

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.