Literature DB >> 18644471

Maintaining replication fork integrity in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells.

Christian J Rudolph1, Amy L Upton, Robert G Lloyd.   

Abstract

In dividing cells, the stalling of replication fork complexes by impediments to DNA unwinding or by template imperfections that block synthesis by the polymerase subunits is a serious threat to genomic integrity and cell viability. What happens to stalled forks depends on the nature of the offending obstacle. In UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells DNA synthesis is delayed for a considerable period, during which forks undergo extensive processing before replication can resume. Thus, restart depends on factors needed to load the replicative helicase, indicating that the replisome may have dissociated. It also requires the RecFOR proteins, which are known to load RecA recombinase on single-stranded DNA, implying that template strands are exposed. To gain a further understanding of how UV irradiation affects replication and how replication resumes after a block, we used fluorescence microscopy and BrdU or radioisotope labelling to examine chromosome replication and cell cycle progression. Our studies confirm that RecFOR promote efficient reactivation of stalled forks and demonstrate that they are also needed for productive replication initiated at the origin, or triggered elsewhere by damage to the DNA. Although delayed, all modes of replication do recover in the absence of these proteins, but nascent DNA strands are degraded more extensively by RecJ exonuclease. However, these strands are also degraded in the presence of RecFOR when restart is blocked by other means, indicating that RecA loading is not sufficient to stabilise and protect the fork. This is consistent with the idea that RecA actively promotes restart. Thus, in contrast to eukaryotic cells, there may be no factor in bacterial cells acting specifically to stabilise stalled forks. Instead, nascent strands may be protected by the simple expedient of promoting restart. We also report that the efficiency of fork reactivation is not affected in polB mutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18644471     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  15 in total

Review 1.  Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Robert P Fuchs; Shingo Fujii
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Involvement of recF in 254 nm ultraviolet radiation resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Xiaosong Chang; Lan Yang; Qing Zhao; Wenjuan Fu; Hao Chen; Zhiqun Qiu; Ji-an Chen; Ran Hu; Weiqun Shu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Promoting and avoiding recombination: contrasting activities of the Escherichia coli RuvABC Holliday junction resolvase and RecG DNA translocase.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Akeel A Mahdi; Geoffrey S Briggs; Robert G Lloyd
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Translesion DNA Synthesis.

Authors:  Alexandra Vaisman; John P McDonald; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2012-11

5.  Functional analyses of Escherichia coli MutS-beta clamp interaction in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Feng Li; Yuanyuan Chen; Lijun Bi; Xian-En Zhang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  A proposal: Source of single strand DNA that elicits the SOS response.

Authors:  Chiara Indiani; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 7.  Recombination and replication.

Authors:  Aisha H Syeda; Michelle Hawkins; Peter McGlynn
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Pathways of resistance to thymineless death in Escherichia coli and the function of UvrD.

Authors:  Natalie C Fonville; Zalman Vaksman; Jessica DeNapoli; P J Hastings; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Pathological replication in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase.

Authors:  Christian J Rudolph; Amy L Upton; Lynda Harris; Robert G Lloyd
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  A reduction in ribonucleotide reductase activity slows down the chromosome replication fork but does not change its localization.

Authors:  Ingvild Odsbu; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.