Literature DB >> 1864336

Motion processing for saccadic eye movements in humans.

R S Gellman1, J R Carl.   

Abstract

1. We studied the latencies and amplitudes of saccades to moving targets in normal human subjects. Targets underwent ramp or step-ramp motions. The goal was to determine how the saccadic system uses information about target velocity. 2. For simple ramp motion saccadic latency decreased as target speed increased. A threshold distance model, which assumes that the target has to move a minimum distance before saccadic processing starts, provided a good fit to the responses of all four subjects and explains discrepancies between previously published findings. 3. A double step experiment showed that target position may have some effect on saccadic amplitude when sampled approximately 70 ms before saccade onset, but it must be sampled at least 140 ms before onset for an accurate saccade to occur. 4. Saccades to simple ramp targets approximated the target position 55 ms before saccade onset. Based on our double step results, this is more compensation than possible by a simple position estimate and implies extrapolation of target motion by the saccadic system. The lack of complete compensation may be due to an underestimate of the target speed and/or of the saccadic latency. 5. A delayed-saccade paradigm resulted in saccades with a longer, constant latency and allowed longer viewing of target motion. These saccades accounted for all but approximately 20 ms of target motion, suggesting that with more processing time of target motion a better extrapolation may be generated. 6. In a step-ramp paradigm the target stepped in one direction, then moved smoothly in the opposite direction. Saccades in this paradigm could be made in either the direction of the step or in the direction of target motion: the direction and latency were determined solely by the time at which the target crossed the fixation point. This time must be calculated from target speed and position, implying that the saccadic system must use speed information to adjust latency or to cancel unnecessary saccades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1864336     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements.

Authors:  C RASHBASS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Velocity prediction in corrective saccades during smooth-pursuit eye movements in monkey.

Authors:  E Keller; S D Johnsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of striate cortex in the guidance of eye movements in the monkey.

Authors:  M A Segraves; M E Goldberg; S Y Deng; C J Bruce; L G Ungerleider; M Mishkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Effects of occipital lobectomy upon eye movements in primate.

Authors:  D S Zee; R J Tusa; S J Herdman; P H Butler; G Gücer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Small step tracking: implications for the oculomotor "dead zone".

Authors:  D Wyman; R M Steinman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The mechanics of human smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  D A Robinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Deficits in visual motion processing following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  W T Newsome; R H Wurtz; M R Dürsteler; A Mikami
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli.

Authors:  W Becker; R Jürgens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Latency and gain of the rabbit's optokinetic reactions to small movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-01-14       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Human smooth pursuit: stimulus-dependent responses.

Authors:  J R Carl; R S Gellman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  26 in total

1.  Predictive strategies in interception tasks: differences between eye and hand movements.

Authors:  Thomas Eggert; Fernando Rivas; Andreas Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Saccades to stationary and moving targets differ in the monkey.

Authors:  Yanfang Guan; Thomas Eggert; Otmar Bayer; Ulrich Büttner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A model that integrates eye velocity commands to keep track of smooth eye displacements.

Authors:  Gunnar Blohm; Lance M Optican; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 4.  Saccades and pursuit: two outcomes of a single sensorimotor process.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets.

Authors:  P van Donkelaar; R G Lee; R S Gellman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation of catch-up saccades during the initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Alexander C Schütz; David Souto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Accuracies of saccades to moving targets during pursuit initiation and maintenance.

Authors:  C E Kim; G K Thaker; D E Ross; D Medoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How is a sensory map read Out? Effects of microstimulation in visual area MT on saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  J M Groh; R T Born; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Is motion perception deficit in schizophrenia a consequence of eye-tracking abnormality?

Authors:  L Elliot Hong; Kathleen A Turano; Hugh B O'Neill; Lei Hao; Ikwunga Wonodi; Robert P McMahon; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.