Literature DB >> 18640879

All pedicle screw instrumentation for Scheuermann's kyphosis correction: is it worth it?

Wael M T Koptan1, Yasser H Elmiligui, Hazem B Elsebaie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Scheuermann's kyphosis has long been treated by a two-staged fusion and instrumentation with a hybrid construct using hooks, pedicle screws, and sublaminar wires. Recent interest in all pedicle screw constructs led to its use in the treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis. Evaluation of this newly described application is needed.
PURPOSE: To compare the results of segmental all pedicle screw constructs versus two-staged hybrid instrumentation in patients with Scheuermann's kyphosis analyzing the amount of correction and incidence of complications. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series reporting on two groups of patients with Scheuermann's kyphosis treated with single-staged all pedicle screws technique versus two-staged anterior release and posterior hybrid instrumentation followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study included 33 patients divided into two groups. The average age was 15 years+9 months and 16 years+8 months, respectively. The average preoperative dorsal kyphosis was 85.5 degrees (Group 1) and 79.8 degrees (Group 2). OUTCOME MEASURES: The deformity was measured by Cobb's method preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Operative time and blood loss were also measured and recorded. The results of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30 questionnaire were also reviewed.
METHODS: The study included 16 patients who underwent a single-staged correction by segmental all pedicle screw constructs and multiple-level posterior osteotomies (Group 1) and 17 who underwent a two-staged fusion and instrumentation with a hybrid construct (Group 2).
RESULTS: Both groups were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The deformity correction of Group 1 had an average of 52.2% postoperatively with 2.4% loss at final follow-up in comparison to Group 2 where the correction was 48.7% postoperatively with 3.1% loss at final follow-up. The operative time was considerably less in Group 1 with an average of 215 minutes than Group 2 with an average of 315 minutes. The average blood loss was 620cc in Group 1 and 910cc in Group 2. The SRS-30 questionnaire in Group 1 averaged 134 and in Group 2 averaged 120.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of multiple-level all pedicle screws technique allowed a rigid anchor for posterior correction of the deformity with less operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay without the need for anterior release. A better correction was achieved and preserved with the use of all pedicle screw constructs. This technique is a useful modality in the treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640879     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  11 in total

1.  Minimum five-year follow-up of posterior-only pedicle screw constructs for thoracic and thoracolumbar kyphosis.

Authors:  Chang Ju Hwang; Lawrence G Lenke; Michael P Kelly; Brenda A Sides; Kathy M Blanke; Stuart Hershman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Anterior release for Scheuermann's disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cao Yun; Cai Liang Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Selection of distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion of Scheuermann kyphosis: is fusion to sagittal stable vertebra necessary?

Authors:  Hakan Serhat Yanik; Ismail Emre Ketenci; Tamer Coskun; Ayhan Ulusoy; Sevki Erdem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Change in Cobb angle of each segment of the major curve after posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR): a preliminary discussion of correction mechanisms of PVCR.

Authors:  Jingming Xie; Tao Li; Yingsong Wang; Zhi Zhao; Ying Zhang; Ni Bi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Long-term outcome after surgical treatment of Scheuermann's Kyphosis (SK).

Authors:  Ujjwal K Debnath; Nasir A Quraishi; Michael J H McCarthy; J R McConnell; S M H Mehdian; Ali Shetaiwi; Michael P Grevitt; John K Webb
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-09-17

6.  Selection of the optimal distal fusion level for Scheuermann kyphosis with different curve patterns: when can we stop above the sagittal stable vertebra?

Authors:  Yanjie Xu; Zongshan Hu; Linlin Zhang; Abdukahar Kiram; Chen Ling; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Zhen Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Surgical treatment of Scheuermann's kyphosis using a combined antero-posterior strategy and pedicle screw constructs: efficacy, radiographic and clinical outcomes in 111 cases.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Zenner Juliane; Marianne Umstaetter; Oliver Meier; René Schmidt; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Posterior-only correction of Scheuermann kyphosis using pedicle screws: economical optimization through screw density reduction.

Authors:  Eyal Behrbalk; Ofir Uri; Ruth M Parks; Michael Paul Grevitt; Marcus Rickert; Bronek Maximilian Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Posterior-only versus combined anterior/posterior fusion in Scheuermann disease: a large retrospective study.

Authors:  Guillaume Riouallon; Christian Morin; Yann-Philippe Charles; Pierre Roussouly; Gaby Kreichati; Ibrahim Obeid; Stéphane Wolff
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Posterior-Only Approach with Pedicle Screws for the Correction of Scheuermann's Kyphosis.

Authors:  Adem Cobden; Akif Albayrak; Yalkin Camurcu; Hakan Sofu; Temel Tacal; Mehmet Akif Kaygusuz
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.