Literature DB >> 35039966

Selection of the optimal distal fusion level for Scheuermann kyphosis with different curve patterns: when can we stop above the sagittal stable vertebra?

Yanjie Xu1, Zongshan Hu1, Linlin Zhang1, Abdukahar Kiram1, Chen Ling1, Zezhang Zhu1, Yong Qiu1, Zhen Liu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the optimal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in the treatment of Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) with different curve patterns.
METHODS: Fifty-two SK patients who underwent posterior surgery between January 2010 and December 2017 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the curve pattern: the Scheuermann thoracic kyphosis (STK group) or Scheuermann thoracolumbar kyphosis (STLK group). Based on the relationship between the sagittal stable vertebra (SSV) and LIV, both groups were further divided into the SSV group and SSV-1 group. Radiographic parameters, distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) incidence and SRS-22 questionnaire scores were evaluated.
RESULTS: In STK and STLK groups, there were no significant differences in most pre- and postoperative radiographic assessments between SSV and SSV-1 subgroups. DJK incidence showed no significant differences between groups during follow-up (P > 0.05). LIV-PSVL was significantly more negative in the SSV-1 group than that in the SSV group (P < 0.001). Within the SSV-1 group, patients with DJK showed a more negative LIV-PSVL (P = 0.039). Moderate correlation was observed between preoperative LIV-PSVL and DJK with a Spearman coefficient of - 0.474 (P = 0.035). Receiver operative characteristic curve analysis showed that the threshold value of preoperative LIV-PSVL to predict DJK was - 37.35 mm (area under the curve 0.882).
CONCLUSION: Shorter fusion stopping at SSV-1 achieved comparable clinical outcomes and did not increase the risk of DJK for both STK and STLK patients. For patients whose preoperative LIV-PSVL <  - 37.35 mm, extending fusion to SSV is an acceptable solution to prevent DJK.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal fusion level; Distal junctional kyphosis; Sagittal stable vertebra; Scheuermann’s kyphosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35039966     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07039-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  23 in total

1.  Surgical correction of Scheuermann's kyphosis.

Authors:  T de Jonge; T Illés; A Bellyei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of Anteroposterior to Posterior-Only Correction of Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Matched-Pair Radiographic Analysis of 92 Patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Lawrence G Lenke; Oliver Meier; Juliane Zenner; Marianne Umschlaeger; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl; Keith H Bridwell; Linda A Koester
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2015-03-04

3.  Sagittal spinopelvic alignment in adolescents associated with Scheuermann's kyphosis: a comparison with normal population.

Authors:  Long Jiang; Yong Qiu; Leilei Xu; Zhen Liu; Zhou Wang; Shifu Sha; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Selection of distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion of Scheuermann kyphosis: is fusion to sagittal stable vertebra necessary?

Authors:  Hakan Serhat Yanik; Ismail Emre Ketenci; Tamer Coskun; Ayhan Ulusoy; Sevki Erdem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Scheuermann's disease: an update.

Authors:  Clémence Palazzo; Frédéric Sailhan; Michel Revel
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. A review of 32 patients.

Authors:  T G Lowe; M D Kasten
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Evidence based medicine: analysis of Scheuermann kyphosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Lowe; Breton G Line
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Francis Denis; Edward C Sun; Robert B Winter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Scheuermann's disease: current diagnosis and treatment approach.

Authors:  Tomer Bezalel; Eli Carmeli; Ella Been; Leonid Kalichman
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.398

10.  Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis: the sagittal stable vertebra concept.

Authors:  Kyu-Jung Cho; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Brenda Sides
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.