Literature DB >> 18640501

Experiences at the Paul Scherrer Institute with a remote patient positioning procedure for high-throughput proton radiation therapy.

Alessandra Bolsi1, Antony J Lomax, Eros Pedroni, Gudrun Goitein, Eugen Hug.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a remote positioning system for accurate and efficient proton radiotherapy treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To minimize positioning time in the treatment room (and thereby maximize beam utility), we have adopted a method for remote patient positioning, with patients positioned and imaged outside the treatment room. Using a CT scanner, positioning is performed using orthogonal topograms with the measured differences to the reference images being used to define daily corrections to the patient table in the treatment room. Possible patient movements during transport and irradiation were analyzed through periodic acquisition of posttreatment topograms. Systematic and random errors were calculated for this daily positioning protocol and for two off-line protocols. The potential time advantage of remote positioning was assessed by computer simulation.
RESULTS: Applying the daily correction protocol, systematic errors calculated over all patients (n = 94) were below 0.6 mm, whereas random errors were below 1.5 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively, for bite-block and for mask immobilization. Differences between pre- and posttreatment images were below 2.8 mm (SD) in abdominal/pelvic region, and below 2.4 mm (SD) in the head. Retrospective data analysis for a subset of patients revealed that off-line protocols would be significantly less accurate. Computer simulations showed that remote positioning can increase patient throughput up to 30%.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a daily imaging and correction protocol based on a "remote" CT could reduce positioning errors to below 2.5 mm and increase beam utility in the treatment room. Patient motion between imaging and treatment were not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640501     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  Small bowel toxicity after high dose spot scanning-based proton beam therapy for paraspinal/retroperitoneal neoplasms.

Authors:  R A Schneider; V Vitolo; F Albertini; T Koch; C Ares; A Lomax; G Goitein; E B Hug
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Patient positioning in the proton radiotherapy era.

Authors:  Salvatore Devicienti; Lidia Strigari; Marco D'Andrea; Marcello Benassi; Vincenzo Dimiccoli; Maurizio Portaluri
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-13

4.  Modelling the throughput capacity of a single-accelerator multitreatment room proton therapy centre.

Authors:  A H Aitkenhead; D Bugg; C G Rowbottom; E Smith; R I Mackay
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  A novel dose-based positioning method for CT image-guided proton therapy.

Authors:  Joey P Cheung; Peter C Park; Laurence E Court; X Ronald Zhu; Rajat J Kudchadker; Steven J Frank; Lei Dong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy.

Authors:  Dante Amelio; Marcus Winter; Daniel Habermehl; Oliver Jäkel; Jurgen Debus; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Dosimetric robustness against setup errors in charged particle radiotherapy of skull base tumors.

Authors:  Filippo Ammazzalorso; Urszula Jelen; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Wolfgang Schlegel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Retrospective analysis of reduced energy switching and room switching times on throughput efficiency of a multi-room proton therapy center.

Authors:  Dennis Mah; Chin Cheng Chen; A Omer Nawaz; Greg Galbreath; Reuven Shmulenson; Nancy Lee; Brian Chon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

10.  A method for acquiring random range uncertainty probability distributions in proton therapy.

Authors:  S M Holloway; M D Holloway; S J Thomas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.