Literature DB >> 18639566

The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.

Galit Yovel1, Arielle Tambini, Talli Brandman.   

Abstract

Recognition of faces is better when faces are presented in the left than right-visual-field. Furthermore, this perceptual asymmetry is a stable individual characteristic. Although it has been commonly assumed that the right hemispheric dominance for face processing underlies this left-visual-field superiority in face recognition, this neural-behavioral association has never been directly demonstrated. Here we applied functional MRI (fMRI) to measure the magnitude of the asymmetric response to faces for each subject. To determine whether the asymmetric neural response to faces is stable across sessions, subjects returned for a second fMRI session. In addition, subjects performed a behavioral experiment outside the scanner where they had to recognize centrally presented chimeric faces, which presented different identities in the right- and left-visual-field. This task yielded a measure of the magnitude of the left-visual-field bias for each subject. Our findings show that the magnitude of the asymmetry of the face-selective area in the fusiform gyrus (FFA) is highly consistent for each individual across scans. We then show that the behavioral left-visual-field asymmetry, measured outside the scanner, was strongly and specifically correlated with the asymmetry of the FFA across subjects, but not with other face-specific or nearby object-general regions. Our findings provide the first empirical evidence for the prevalent idea that perceptual asymmetries in face recognition are associated with the well-known hemispheric asymmetry for faces. We conclude that the FFA asymmetry is a highly stable individual characteristic that underlies the well-established left-visual-field superiority for face recognition.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639566     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  66 in total

1.  Exogenous attention to facial vs non-facial emotional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Dominique Kessel; Alejandra Carboni; Sara López-Martín; Jacobo Albert; Manuel Tapia; Francisco Mercado; Almudena Capilla; José A Hinojosa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Culture differences in neural processing of faces and houses in the ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Joshua O S Goh; Eric D Leshikar; Bradley P Sutton; Jiat Chow Tan; Sam K Y Sim; Andrew C Hebrank; Denise C Park
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Asymmetries of the human social brain in the visual, auditory and chemical modalities.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giuliana Lucci; Andrea Mazzatenta; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Attending to What and Where: Background Connectivity Integrates Categorical and Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Alexa Tompary; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Andrea Wheeler; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Event-related potential and functional MRI measures of face-selectivity are highly correlated: a simultaneous ERP-fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Boaz Sadeh; Ilana Podlipsky; Andrey Zhdanov; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.

Authors:  Chenglin Li; Zhiguo Wang; Hui Bao; Jianping Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Functionally defined white matter reveals segregated pathways in human ventral temporal cortex associated with category-specific processing.

Authors:  Jesse Gomez; Franco Pestilli; Nathan Witthoft; Golijeh Golarai; Alina Liberman; Sonia Poltoratski; Jennifer Yoon; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Cerebral asymmetries: complementary and independent processes.

Authors:  Gjurgjica Badzakova-Trajkov; Isabelle S Häberling; Reece P Roberts; Michael C Corballis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consistency and variability in functional localisers.

Authors:  Keith J Duncan; Chotiga Pattamadilok; Iris Knierim; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.