Literature DB >> 18639216

Improving shoulder dystocia management among resident and attending physicians using simulations.

Dena Goffman1, Hye Heo, Setul Pardanani, Irwin R Merkatz, Peter S Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether a simulation-based educational program would improve residents' and attending physicians' performance in a simulated shoulder dystocia. STUDY
DESIGN: Seventy-one obstetricians participated in an unanticipated simulated shoulder dystocia, an educational debriefing session, and a subsequent shoulder dystocia simulation. Each simulation was scored, based on standardized checklists for 4 technical maneuvers and 6 communication tasks, by 2 physician observers. Paired Student t tests were used for analysis.
RESULTS: Forty-three attendings and 28 residents participated. Residents showed significant improvement in mean maneuver (3.3 +/- 0.9 vs 3.9 +/- 0.4, P = .001) and communication (3.5 +/- 1.2 vs 4.9 +/- 1.0, P < .0001) scores after simulation training. Attending physicians' communication (3.6 +/- 1.6 vs 4.9 +/- 1.1, P < .0001) scores were significantly improved after training.
CONCLUSION: Our program improved physician performance in the management of simulated shoulder dystocia deliveries. Obstetric emergency simulation training can improve physicians' communication skills, at all levels of training, and should be incorporated into labor and delivery quality improvement measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639216     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Grommets and glue guns: standardization of a pfannenstiel model for low-fidelity obstetrics-gynecology education.

Authors:  Kelly A Best; Brent E Seibel; Deborah S Lyon
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-12

2.  Assessment of long-term knowledge retention following single-day simulation training for uncommon but critical obstetrical events.

Authors:  Mary A Vadnais; Laura E Dodge; Christopher S Awtrey; Hope A Ricciotti; Toni H Golen; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-04-25

3.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Randomised controlled study to assess skill retention at 6 vs 12 months after simulation training in shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Menelik M H Lee; Chao Ngan Chan; Betty Y T Lau; Teresa W L Ma
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2017-10-03

Review 5.  Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand.

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Gary L Darmstadt; Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Predictive factors for the success of McRoberts' manoeuvre and suprapubic pressure in relieving shoulder dystocia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zara Lin Zau Lok; Yvonne Kwun Yue Cheng; Tak Yeung Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Shoulder Dystocia Delivery by Emergency Medicine Residents: A High-fidelity versus a Novel Low-fidelity Simulation Model-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Danielle Hart; Jessie Nelson; Johanna Moore; Eric Gross; Adeleki Oni; James Miner
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-09-23

Review 8.  Debriefing to improve outcomes from critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Keith Couper; Bilal Salman; Jasmeet Soar; Judith Finn; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 17.440

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.