Literature DB >> 15475668

Effects of individual and family functioning on interest in genetic testing.

Deborah J Bowen1, Emily Bourcier, Nancy Press, Frances M Lewis, Wylie Burke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study reports on the important issue of how family communication and support regarding breast cancer risk affects interest in genetic testing and mental health.
METHODS: Participants (n = 221) were women aged 18-74 who had at least one relative of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, and lived within 60 miles of Seattle, Wash.
RESULTS: Communication about breast cancer risk was reported with very low frequency across all types of relatives. Women talked with their mothers and sisters more often than their fathers, brothers, or children. The only significant predictor of interest in genetic testing was the individual level variable of seeking social support.
CONCLUSION: Social support needs might be a part of the genetic testing process. 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475668     DOI: 10.1159/000080301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Genet        ISSN: 1422-2795


  17 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Lindsey Hoskins; Sheila Prindiville; Regina Kenen; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  What do we tell the children? Contrasting the disclosure choices of two HD families regarding risk status and predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Kathryn Holt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Family health information sharing among older adults: reaching more family members.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Ellen J Schafer
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-07-30

6.  Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Anne L Ersig; Natalia R Kuhn; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

8.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Rosalie Corona; Joann N Bodurtha; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-01-06

10.  The impact of social roles on the experience of men in BRCA1/2 families: implications for counseling.

Authors:  Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.