Literature DB >> 15114303

Usefulness of three-dimensional, multidetector row CT (virtual gastroscopy and multiplanar reconstruction) in the evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology.

Suryaprakash Bhandari1, Chan Sup Shim, Jung Hoon Kim, In Seop Jung, Joo Young Cho, Joon Seong Lee, Moon Sung Lee, Boo Sung Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the role of three-dimensional multidetector row CT for detection, precise localization, and staging of gastric cancer by comparison with conventional endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology.
METHODS: Sixty-three patients with gastric cancer (31 early stage, 32 advanced) were evaluated by EGD with biopsies, EUS, and three-dimensional multidetector row CT between January 2003 to August 2003. Three-dimensional multidetector row CT findings were analyzed by a single radiologist blinded to the endoscopic findings. Among 63 patients, the findings were confirmed in 48 at surgery or by EMR. In the remaining cases, the findings were confirmed by EGD and biopsy specimen. The accuracy of three-dimensional multidetector row CT for detection, localization, and staging of gastric cancer was determined, compared with endoscopy, EUS, and histopathology.
RESULTS: Among the 63 patients, there were 67 gastric cancers. The overall accuracy of three-dimensional multidetector row CT for detection of gastric lesions was 94% (63/67), with accuracies of 96.7% (30/31) and 100% (32/32) for detection of, respectively, early and advanced stage gastric cancer. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for EUS and three-dimensional multidetector row CT in the pre-operative determination of depth of invasion (T stage) were, respectively, 87.5%, 82.4%, and 96%; and 83.3%, 69.1%, and 94.4%. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of EUS and three-dimensional multidetector row CT for lymph node staging was, respectively, 79.1%, 57%, and 89.5%; and 75%, 57.4%, and 89.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional multidetector row CT, along with virtual gastroscopy is a promising method for pre-operative evaluation of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15114303     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00169-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  49 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Roberta Cardoso; Natalie Coburn; Rajini Seevaratnam; Rinku Sutradhar; Laercio Gomes Lourenco; Alyson Mahar; Calvin Law; Elaine Yong; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Pre-operative lymph node status of gastric cancer evaluated by multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Min Wang; Yanwei Ye; Qing Yang; Jingjing Li; Chao Han; Wei Wang; Chunlin Zhao; Jianguo Wen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Evaluation of contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT in staging gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Zhou Wei; Jie-Ping Yu; Jun Li; Chang-Sheng Liu; Xiao-Hua Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the preoperative staging and posttherapy follow up of gastric cancer: comparison with spiral CT.

Authors:  Elgin Ozkan; Mine Araz; Cigdem Soydal; Ozlem N Kucuk
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  [Endosonography of the gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  M Moehler; P R Galle; R Kiesslich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert Michael Kwee; Thomas Christian Kwee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Evaluation of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO): diagnostic performance in post-contrast images using new diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Takaya Tokuhara; Nobuhiko Tanigawa; Mitsuru Matsuki; Eiji Nomura; Hideaki Mabuchi; Sang-Woong Lee; Yoshiaki Tatsumi; Haruto Nishimura; Ryoji Yoshinaka; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Isamu Narabayashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Design of the image-guided biopsy marking system for gastroscopy.

Authors:  Deyu Sun; Weiling Hu; Wei Wu; Jiquan Liu; Huilong Duan; Jianmin Si
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-06

10.  Positioning during CT gastrography in patients with gastric cancer: the effect on gastric distension and lesion conspicuity.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Ah Young Kim; Jin Hug Lee; Jeong Hwan Yook; Eun Sil Yu; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.