BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are biomarkers of cardiovascular disease that is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Conflicting data on the influence of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on BNP and NT-proBNP levels in CKD may stem from failure to account fully for the effects of coexistent cardiac disease, dysfunction, and volume overload. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Prospective head-to-head comparison of plasma BNP and NT-proBNP in ambulatory euvolemic CKD patients with normal LV ejection fraction and no manifest cardiac or vascular disease. GFR was estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, BNP and NT-proBNP measured using Abbott AxSYM and Roche Elecsys assays, respectively, and cardiac morphology and function assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: In 142 patients (42% female) of mean age 60 +/- 11 yr, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 71% +/- 6%, GFR 38 +/- 14 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and median BNP and NT-proBNP level 59 and 311 pg/ml, respectively. Multivariate predictors of NT-proBNP level were GFR, beta-blocker usage, LV mass index, and hemoglobin level. Plasma BNP was independently predicted by LV mass index and beta-blocker usage but not GFR. In the 74 patients without diastolic dysfunction, there was a significant rise in NT-proBNP but not BNP as GFR declined. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike NT-proBNP, plasma BNP level is relatively independent of GFR. BNP may therefore be the more appropriate biomarker to screen for cardiac dysfunction in CKD.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are biomarkers of cardiovascular disease that is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Conflicting data on the influence of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on BNP and NT-proBNP levels in CKD may stem from failure to account fully for the effects of coexistent cardiac disease, dysfunction, and volume overload. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Prospective head-to-head comparison of plasma BNP and NT-proBNP in ambulatory euvolemic CKDpatients with normal LV ejection fraction and no manifest cardiac or vascular disease. GFR was estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, BNP and NT-proBNP measured using Abbott AxSYM and Roche Elecsys assays, respectively, and cardiac morphology and function assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: In 142 patients (42% female) of mean age 60 +/- 11 yr, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 71% +/- 6%, GFR 38 +/- 14 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and median BNP and NT-proBNP level 59 and 311 pg/ml, respectively. Multivariate predictors of NT-proBNP level were GFR, beta-blocker usage, LV mass index, and hemoglobin level. Plasma BNP was independently predicted by LV mass index and beta-blocker usage but not GFR. In the 74 patients without diastolic dysfunction, there was a significant rise in NT-proBNP but not BNP as GFR declined. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike NT-proBNP, plasma BNP level is relatively independent of GFR. BNP may therefore be the more appropriate biomarker to screen for cardiac dysfunction in CKD.
Authors: S R Ommen; R A Nishimura; C P Appleton; F A Miller; J K Oh; M M Redfield; A J Tajik Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel E Forman; Javed Butler; Yongfei Wang; William T Abraham; Christopher M O'Connor; Stephen S Gottlieb; Evan Loh; Barry M Massie; Michael W Rich; Lynne Warner Stevenson; James B Young; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Roy S Gardner; Kwok S Chong; Eileen O'Meara; Alan Jardine; Ian Ford; Theresa A McDonagh Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-10-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Jasmine Grewal; Robert McKelvie; Eva Lonn; Peter Tait; Jonas Carlsson; Monica Gianni; Christina Jarnert; Hans Persson Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Marc S Sabatine; David A Morrow; James A de Lemos; Torbjorn Omland; Milind Y Desai; Milenko Tanasijevic; Christian Hall; Carolyn H McCabe; Eugene Braunwald Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-11-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nisha Bansal; Amanda Hyre Anderson; Wei Yang; Robert H Christenson; Christopher R deFilippi; Rajat Deo; Daniel L Dries; Alan S Go; Jiang He; John W Kusek; James P Lash; Dominic Raj; Sylvia Rosas; Myles Wolf; Xiaoming Zhang; Michael G Shlipak; Harold I Feldman Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 10.121